SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 or [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to ------- ------- Commission File No. 0-3189 ------ NATHAN'S FAMOUS, INC. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 11-3166443 - ----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 1400 Old Country Road, Westbury, New York 11590 - ----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (516) 338-8500 ----------------------------- Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Class Name of Each Exchange on which Registered -------------- ----------------------------------------- None None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock - par value $.01 ----------------------------- (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K [ ]. The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 7, 2002 was approximately $24,399,888. Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of June 7, 2002, there were 6,272,511 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share outstanding. Documents incorporated by reference: Part III - Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14-A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.PART I Item 1. Business - ------- -------- As used herein, unless we otherwise specify, the terms "we," "us," "our" and "Nathan's" mean Nathan's Famous, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Miami Subs Corporation, owner of the Miami Subs brand, and NF Roasters Corp., owner of the Kenny Rogers brand. We have historically operated and franchised fast food units featuring Nathan's famous brand all beef frankfurters, crinkle-cut french fried potatoes, and a variety of other menu offerings. Our Nathan's brand company-owned and franchised units operate under the name "Nathan's Famous," the name first used at our original Coney Island restaurant opened in 1916. Since fiscal 1998, we supplemented our Nathan's franchise program with our Branded Product Program which enables foodservice retailers to sell some of Nathan's proprietary products outside of the realm of a traditional franchise relationship. During fiscal 2000, we acquired the intellectual property rights, including trademarks, recipes and franchise agreements of Roasters Corp. and Roasters Franchise Corp. and also completed a merger with Miami Subs Corporation whereby we acquired the remaining 70% of Miami Subs common stock we did not already own. Over the past five years, we have focused on developing our restaurant system by opening franchised restaurants, operating our existing company-owned restaurants, expanding our supermarket licensing program of the Nathan's brand, implementing our Nathan's Branded Product Program, and began developing an international master franchising program. In an effort to expand our restaurant system and expand our brand portfolio, during fiscal 2000 we completed our merger with Miami Subs Corp. and our acquisition of the intellectual property of the Kenny Rogers Roasters franchise system. In addition, through our acquisition of Miami Subs, we also secured certain exclusive co- branding rights to use the Arthur Treachers' brand within the United States. We have continued to capitalize on the co-branding opportunities within our existing restaurant system, as well as seek to develop new multi-brand marketing and development plans. At March 31, 2002, our system, consisting of Nathan's Famous, Kenny Rogers Roasters and Miami Subs restaurants, included 364 franchised units, including three units operating pursuant to management agreements, 22 company-owned units concentrated in the New York metropolitan area (including New Jersey) and Florida and approximately 1,500 branded product points of sale under our Branded Product Program, located in 39 states, the District of Columbia, and 14 foreign countries. We plan to further introduce our co-branding opportunities within the existing restaurant system, seek to expand the scope and market penetration of our Branded Product Program, further develop the restaurant operations of existing franchised and company-owned outlets for all restaurant concepts, and open new franchised outlets of all of our restaurant concepts in traditional or captive market environments. We may selectively consider opening new company-owned restaurants. We also plan to develop an international presence through the use of master franchising agreements based upon individual or combined use of all three restaurant concepts. We were incorporated in Delaware on July 10, 1992 under the name "Nathan's Famous Holding Corporation" to act as the parent of a Delaware corporation then-known as Nathan's Famous, Inc. On December 15, 1992, we changed our name to Nathan's Famous, Inc. and our Delaware subsidiary changed its name to Nathan's Famous Operating Corporation. The Delaware subsidiary was organized in October 1989 in connection with its reincorporation in Delaware from that of a New York corporation named "Nathan's Famous, Inc." The New York Nathan's was incorporated on July 10, 1925 as a successor to the sole proprietorship that opened the first Nathan's restaurant in Coney Island in 1916. On July 23, 1987, Equicor Group, Ltd. was merged with and into the New York Nathan's in a "going private" transaction. The New York Nathan's, the Delaware subsidiary and Equicor may all be deemed to be our predecessors. 1
Acquisitions Pursuant to the Joint Plan of Reorganization of the Official Committee of Franchisees of Roasters Corp. and Roasters Franchise Corp. as confirmed by the U. S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, Durham Division, we acquired through our wholly owned subsidiary, NF Roasters Corp., the intellectual property rights, including trademarks, recipes and franchise agreements of Roasters Corp. and Roasters Franchise Corp. for $1,250,000 in cash plus related expenses, which was paid out of working capital on April 1, 1999. On November 25, 1998, we purchased 2,030,250 shares of Miami Subs Corporation (after giving effect to a 4 for 1 reverse stock split), or approximately 30% of its then outstanding common stock for $4,200,000. On September 30, 1999, we completed our merger with Miami Subs and acquired the remaining outstanding shares of Miami Subs in exchange for 2,317,980 shares of our common stock and warrants to acquire 579,040 additional shares of our common stock at a price of $6.00 per share. Restaurant Operations Nathan's Concept and Menus Our Nathan's concept offers a wide range of facility designs and sizes, suitable to a vast variety of locations and features a core menu, consisting of the "Nathan's Famous" all-beef frankfurters, crinkle-cut french fries and beverages. Nathans' menu is designed to be tailored to take advantage of site-specific market opportunities by adding complementary food items to the core menu. The Nathan's concept is suitable to stand alone or be co-branded with other nationally recognized brands. Nathans' hot dogs are all-beef and are free from all fillers and starches. Hot dogs are flavored with the original secret blend of spices created by Ida Handwerker in 1916, which historically have distinguished Nathans' hot dogs. Hot dogs are prepared and served in accordance with procedures which have not varied significantly in more than 86 years. Our signature crinkle-cut french fried potatoes are featured at each Nathan's restaurant. Nathans' french fried potatoes are cooked to order in 100% cholesterol-free corn oil. We believe that the majority of sales in our company-owned units consist of Nathan's famous hot dogs, crinkle-cut french fried potatoes and beverages. Individual Nathan's restaurants supplement their core menu of hot dogs, french fries and beverages with a variety of other quality menu choices: chargrilled hamburgers, chargrilled chicken sandwiches, Philly Cheesesteaks, selected seafood and other chicken items, a breakfast menu and assorted desserts and snacks. While the number of supplemental menus carried varies with the size of the unit, the specific supplemental menus chosen are tailored to local food preferences and market conditions. Each of these supplemental menu options consists of a number of individual items; for example, the hamburger menu may include chargrilled bacon cheeseburgers, superburgers and super cheeseburgers. We maintain the same quality standard with each of Nathan's supplemental menus as we do with Nathans' core hot dog and french fried potato menu. Thus, for example, hamburgers and sandwiches are prepared to order and not pre-wrapped or kept warm under lights. Nathan's also has a "Kids Meal" program in which various menu alternatives are combined with toys to appeal to the children's market. Nathans' restaurant units are available in a range of sizes from 300 to 4,000 sq. ft. We have also developed Nathan's carts, kiosks, and modular units. Our smaller units may not have customer seating areas, although they may often share seating areas with other fast food outlets in food court settings. Other units generally provide seating for 45 to 125 customers. Carts, kiosks and 2
modular units generally carry only the core menu. This menu is supplemented by a number of other menu selections in our other restaurant types. We believe Nathan's carts, kiosks, modular units and food court designs are particularly well-suited for placement in non-traditional sites, such as airports, travel plazas, stadiums, schools, convenience stores, entertainment facilities, military facilities, business and industry food service, within larger retail operations and other captive markets. Many of these smaller units have been designed specifically to support our expanding Branded Product Program. All of these units feature the Nathan's logo and utilize a contemporary design. Miami Subs Concept and Menu Our Miami Subs concept features a wide variety of moderately priced lunch, dinner and snack foods, including hot and cold submarine sandwiches, various ethnic foods such as gyros and pita sandwiches, flame grilled hamburgers and chicken breast sandwiches, cheesesteaks, chicken wings, fresh salads, ice cream and other desserts. Soft drinks, iced tea, coffee, beer and wine are also offered. Freshness and quality of breads, produce and other ingredients are emphasized in Miami Subs restaurants. The Miami Subs menu may include low-fat selections such as salads, grilled chicken breasts, and non-fat frozen yogurt which we believe are perceived as nutritious and appealing to health conscious consumers. We believe Miami Subs has become known for certain "signature" foods, such as grilled chicken on pita bread, cheesesteaks and gyros on pita bread. Miami Subs restaurants feature a distinctive decor unique to the Miami Subs concept. The exterior of free- standing restaurants feature an unusual roof design and neon pastel highlights for easy recognition. Interiors have a tropical motif in a neon pink and blue color scheme with murals of fish, mermaids, flamingos and tropical foliage. Exteriors and interiors are brightly lit to create an inviting, attractive ambience to distinguish our restaurants from those of our competitors. At March 31, 2002, 112 of the Miami Subs restaurants were located in freestanding buildings, ranging between 2,000 and 5,000 square feet. Certain other Miami Subs restaurants are scaled down to accommodate non-traditional captive market environments. Miami Subs restaurants are typically open seven days a week, generally opening at 10:30 am, with many of the restaurants having extended late-night hours. Indoor service is provided at a walk-up counter where the customer places an order and is given an order number and a drink cup. The customer then proceeds to a self service soda bar while the food is prepared to order. Drive-thru service is provided at substantially all free-standing Miami Subs restaurants. We estimate that drive-thru sales account for approximately 45% of sales in free-standing restaurants. Currently, 102 Miami Subs restaurants have introduced our co-branded menu consisting of Nathan's, Kenny Rogers Roasters or Arthur Treachers' signature products. We have created a new image for Miami Subs based upon this co-branding strategy called "Miami Subs Plus" which has been heavily marketed in Southern Florida beginning in July 2001. Kenny Rogers Roasters Concept and Menu The Kenny Rogers Roasters concept was first introduced in 1991 with the idea of serving home-style family foods based on a menu centered around wood-fire rotisserie chicken. Kenny Rogers Roasters' unique proprietary marinade and spice formula, combined with wood-fire roasting in a specifically designed rotisserie, became the basis of a breakthrough taste in rotisserie chicken. The menu, design and service style were created to position the concept midway between quick-serve and casual dining. This format, coupled with a customer friendly environment developed for dine-in or take-home consumers, is the precursor of the Kenny Rogers Roasters system. The distinctive flavoring of our Kenny Rogers Roasters chicken is the result of a two step process. First, our chickens are marinated using a specially flavored proprietary marinade. Then a second unique blend of spice is applied to the chicken prior to cooking in the open flame wood-fire rotisserie in full view of customers at the restaurant. Other entrees offered in Kenny 3
Rogers Roasters restaurants may include Honey Bourbon BBQ ribs and rotisserie turkey. Complimenting Kenny Rogers Roasters main courses are a wide variety of freshly prepared side dishes, corn muffins, soups, salads and sandwiches. The menu offers a healthful alternative to traditional quick-serve menu offerings that caters to families and individuals. The traditional Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurants are free standing buildings offering dine-in and drive thru delivery options ranging in size between 3,000 and 4,000 sq. ft. with seating capacity for approximately 125 guests. Other prototype restaurant designs that are being considered include food court units and scaled down in-line and free standing restaurant types. We have recently begun to co-brand Kenny Rogers Roasters with Nathan's by introducing Nathan's famous all-beef frankfurters, crinkle-cut french fries and hamburger menus to supplement Roasters' core menu offerings. Franchise Operations At March 31, 2002, our franchise system, including our Nathan's, Miami Subs and Kenny Rogers restaurant concepts, consisted of 364 units operating in 22 states and 14 foreign countries. Today, our franchise system counts among its 172 franchisees and licensees such well known companies as Host Marriott Services USA, Inc., ARAMARK Leisure Services, Inc., CA1 Services, Inc., Service America Corp., Culinart and Sodexho USA. We continue to seek to market our franchising program to larger, experienced and successful operators with the financial and business capability to develop multiple franchise units. As of March 31, 2002, Host Marriott operated 34 franchised outlets, including 17 units at airports, 14 units within highway travel plazas and three units within malls. Nathan's Franchise Program Franchisees are required to execute a standard franchise agreement prior to opening each Nathan's Famous unit. Our current standard Nathan's franchise agreement provides for, among other things, a one-time $30,000 franchise fee payable upon execution of the agreement, a monthly royalty payment based on 5.0% of restaurant sales and the expenditure of 2.0% of restaurant sales on advertising. We also offer a modified franchise agreement tailored to meet the needs of franchisees who desire to operate a Nathan's of a smaller size offering a reduced menu. The modified franchise agreement provides for the initial franchise fee of $15,000 which is payable upon execution of the agreement, monthly royalties of 5.0% and the expenditure of 2.0% of restaurant sales on advertising. We may offer alternatives to the standard franchise agreement, particularly having to do with advertising requirements. Marriott and National Restaurant Management, Inc., are among those franchisees who are not subject to the requirement to spend a percentage of sales on advertising. The initial term of the typical franchise agreement is 20 years, with a 15-year renewal option by the franchisee, subject to conditions contained in the franchise agreement. Franchisees are approved on the basis of their business background, evidence of restaurant management experience, net worth and capital available for investment in relation to the proposed scope of the development agreement. We provide numerous support services to our Nathan's franchisees. We assist in and approve all site selections. Thereafter, we provide architectural plans suitable for restaurants of varying sizes and configurations for use in food-court, in-line and free-standing locations. We also assist in establishing building design specifications, reviewing construction compliance, equipping the restaurant and providing appropriate menus to coordinate with the restaurant design and location selected by the franchisee. We typically do not sell food, equipment or supplies to our Nathan's franchisees. 4
We offer various management training courses for management personnel of company-owned and franchised Nathan's restaurants. At least one restaurant manager from each restaurant must successfully complete our mandated management training program. We also offer additional operations and general management training courses for all restaurant managers and other managers with supervisory responsibilities. We provide standard manuals to each franchisee covering training and operations, products and equipment and local marketing programs. We also provide ongoing advice and assistance to franchisees. Franchised restaurants are required to be operated in accordance with uniform operating standards and specifications relating to the selection, quality and preparation of menu items, signage, decor, equipment, uniforms, suppliers, maintenance and cleanliness of premises and customer service. All standards and specifications are developed by us and applied on a system-wide basis. We continuously monitor franchisee operations and inspect restaurants. Franchisees are required to furnish us with detailed monthly sales or operating reports which assist us in monitoring the franchisee's compliance with its franchise or license agreement. We make both announced and unannounced inspections of restaurants to ensure that our practices and procedures are being followed. We have the right to terminate a franchise if a franchisee does not operate and maintain a restaurant in accordance with the requirements of its franchise or license agreement. We also have the right to terminate a franchise for non-compliance with certain other terms and conditions of the franchise or license agreement such as non-payment of royalties, sale of unauthorized products, bankruptcy or conviction of a felony. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, ("fiscal 2002") franchisees have opened 16 new Nathan's franchised units and we did not terminate any Nathan's franchise agreements for non-compliance. Franchisees who desire to open multiple units in a specific territory within the United States may enter into a standard area development agreement under which we receive an advance fee based upon the number of proposed units which the franchisee is authorized to open. This advance is credited against the franchise fee payable to us as provided in the standard franchise agreement. We may also grant exclusive territorial rights in foreign countries for the development of Nathan's units based upon compliance with a predetermined development schedule. We would require an exclusivity fee to be conveyed for such exclusive rights. Miami Subs Franchise Program Franchisees are required to execute a standard franchise agreement relating to the operation of each Miami Subs restaurant. Currently, the term of the franchise agreement is between five and 20 years, and the initial franchise fee is $30,000 for traditional restaurants and $15,000 for certain non-traditional restaurants. The standard franchise agreement provides for the payment of a monthly royalty fee of 4.5% on gross restaurant sales for the term of the franchise agreement, and additional charges based on a percentage of restaurant sales, typically totaling 2.25%, to support various system-wide and local advertising funds. In addition to individual franchise agreements, we have from time to time entered into development agreements with certain franchisees. The development agreement establishes a minimum number of restaurants that the franchisee is required to open in an agreed upon exclusive area during the term of the agreement. In addition to receiving a franchise fee for each restaurant opened, we also receive a non-refundable fee based upon the number of restaurants committed to be opened under the agreement. Operations personnel train and assist Miami Subs franchisees in opening new restaurants and monitor the operations of existing restaurants as part of the support provided under the franchise program. New franchisees are required to complete a six-week training program. Upon the opening of a new franchised restaurant, we typically send representatives to the restaurant to assist the franchisee during the opening period. These company representatives work in the restaurant to monitor compliance with Miami Subs' standards and provide additional on-site training of the franchisee's restaurant personnel. 5
We also provide development and construction support services to our Miami Subs franchisees. We review and approve plans and specifications for the restaurants before improvements begin. Our personnel typically visit the facility during construction to meet with the franchisee's site contractor and to verify that construction standards are met. The six-week training program consists of formal classroom training and in-restaurant training featuring various aspects of day-to-day operations leading to certification in all functioning positions. Topics covered include human resources, accounting, purchasing and labor and food handling laws. Standard operating manuals are provided to each franchisee. To maintain uniform standards of appearance, service and food and beverage quality for our Miami Subs restaurants, we have adopted policies and implemented a monitoring program. Franchisees are expected to adhere to specifications and standards in connection with the selection and purchase of products used in the operation of the Miami Subs restaurant. Detailed specifications are provided for the products used, and franchisees must request approval for any deviations. We do not generally sell equipment, supplies or products to our Miami Subs franchisees. The franchise agreement requires franchisees to operate their restaurants in accordance with Miami Subs' requirements. We require our franchisees to use specified kitchen equipment to maximize consistency and speed of food preparation. Ongoing advice and assistance is provided to franchisees in connection with the operation and management of each restaurant. Our area consultants are responsible for oversight of franchisees and periodically visit each restaurant. During such visits, the area consultant completes a report which contains evaluations on speed of preparation for menu items, quality of delivered product, cleanliness of restaurant facilities as well as evaluations of managers and other personnel. The area consultants also make announced and unannounced follow-up visits to ensure adherence to operational specifications. Franchisees are required to furnish us with detailed monthly sales or operating reports which assist us in monitoring the franchisee's compliance with its franchise agreement. We have the right to terminate a franchise if a franchisee does not operate and maintain a restaurant in accordance with the requirements of its franchise agreement. We also have the right to terminate a franchise for non-compliance with certain other terms and conditions of the franchise agreement such as non-payment of royalties, sale of unauthorized products, bankruptcy or conviction of a felony. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, franchisees have opened 4 new Miami Subs franchised units and we did not terminate any Miami Subs franchise agreements for non-compliance. Kenny Rogers Roasters Franchise Program Kenny Rogers Roasters franchisees from the previous franchise system were required to execute amended and restated franchise agreements in order to preserve their franchised units. The amended and restated franchise agreement affirmed the franchisees responsibilities and offered reduced royalties to 3% of sales and waived advertising fund payments through March 31, 2001. These reduced rates have been extended until March 31, 2003. Future Kenny Rogers Roasters franchisees will have to execute our current standard franchise agreement which provides for, among other things, a one-time $30,000 franchise fee payable upon execution of the agreement, a monthly royalty payment based on 4.5% of restaurant sales and the expenditure of 2.5% of restaurant sales on advertising. In some specific situations, we may offer alternatives to the standard franchise agreement. The initial term of the typical franchise agreement is 20 years, with up to a 20-year renewal option by the franchisee, subject to conditions contained in the franchise agreement. Franchisees will be approved on the basis of their business background, evidence of restaurant management experience, net worth and capital available for investment in relation to the proposed scope of the development agreement. We expect to provide numerous restaurant opening support services to future Kenny Rogers Roasters franchisees. We expect to assist in and approve all Kenny Rogers Roasters site selections. Thereafter, we expect to provide architectural prototype plans suitable for Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurants of varying sizes and configurations, for use in food-court, in-line and free-standing locations. We will also assist in establishing building design specifications, reviewing construction compliance, equipping the restaurant and providing appropriate 6
menus to coordinate with the prototype restaurant design and location selected by the Kenny Rogers Roasters franchisee. We do not typically sell food, equipment or supplies to our Kenny Rogers Roasters franchisees. We plan to offer various management training courses for management personnel of future Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurants. At least one restaurant manager from each new restaurant or co-branded restaurant will have to successfully complete Kenny Rogers Roasters' mandated management training program. We also plan to offer additional operations and general management training courses to all Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurant managers and other managers with supervisory responsibilities. We provide standard manuals to each franchisee covering training and operations, products and equipment and local marketing programs. We also provide ongoing advice and assistance to franchisees. Franchised restaurants are required to be operated in accordance with uniform operating standards and specifications relating to the selection, quality and preparation of menu items, signage, decor, equipment, uniforms, suppliers, maintenance and cleanliness of premises and customer service. We develop all standards and specifications, which are applied on a system-wide basis. We continuously monitor franchisee operations. Franchisees are required to furnish us with detailed monthly sales or operating reports which assist us in monitoring the franchisee's compliance with its franchise agreement. We have the right to terminate a franchise if a franchisee does not operate and maintain a restaurant in accordance with the requirements of its franchise or license agreement. We also have the right to terminate a franchise for non-compliance with certain other terms and conditions of the franchise agreement such as non- payment of royalties, sale of unauthorized products, bankruptcy or conviction of a felony. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, three Kenny Rogers Roasters franchise agreements were terminated for non-compliance. Franchisees who desire to open multiple units in a specific territory within the United States may generally enter into a standard area development agreement under which we would receive an advance fee based upon the number of proposed units which the franchisee is authorized to open. This advance would be credited against the franchise fee payable to us, as provided in its standard franchise agreement. In some circumstances, we may grant exclusive territorial rights in foreign countries for the development of Roasters units based upon compliance with a predetermined development schedule Company-owned Nathan's Restaurant Operations As of March 31, 2002, we operated 16 company-owned Nathan's units, including one kiosk and one seasonal location, in New York and New Jersey. Three of these restaurants are older and significantly larger units which do not conform to current designs. These units carry a broader selection of menu items than current designs. The items offered at our restaurants, other than the core menu, tend to have lower margins than the core menu. The older units require significantly higher levels of initial investment than current franchise designs and tend to operate at a lower sales/investment ratio. Consequently, we do not intend to replicate these older units in future company-owned units. We entered into a food service lease agreement with Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. under which we lease space in certain Home Depot Improvement Centers to operate Nathan's restaurants. The term of each Home Depot agreement is five years from the date on which the restaurant opens, with one five year renewal option. We currently operate seven units within Home Depot Improvement Centers, including one kiosk. Company-owned units currently range in size from approximately 440 square feet to 10,000 square feet and are located principally in retail shopping environments or are free-standing buildings. All restaurants, except our seasonal boardwalk location, have seating to accommodate between 30 and 325 customers. The restaurants are designed to appeal to all ages and generally are open seven days a week. We have established high standards for food quality, cleanliness and service at our restaurants and regularly monitor the operations of our restaurants to ensure adherence to these standards. Restaurant service areas, seating, signage and general decor are contemporary. 7
Company-owned Miami Subs Restaurant Operations As of March 31, 2002, we operated four Miami Subs restaurants located in Southern Florida. All of our company-owned Miami Subs restaurants are free-standing restaurants offering drive-thru operations as well as dine-in seating. The restaurants generally are approximately 3,100 square feet with seating capacity for approximately 90 guests. We are presently evaluating our company-owned restaurants and might seek to franchise some of these restaurants. Commencing January 2000, we introduced a re-engineered Miami Subs menu within our company-owned restaurants. Throughout fiscal years 2001 and 2002, our menu development activities emphasized our co-branding strategy of including certain Nathan's, Kenny Rogers Roasters and Arthur Treachers' signature products within the Miami Subs restaurant system. Company-owned Kenny Rogers Roasters Restaurant Operations At March 31, 2002, we operated two Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurants in Rockville Centre and Commack New York. These units are traditional free-standing buildings, each with a drive thru. In addition to the standard Kenny Rogers Roasters menu, both restaurants feature Nathan's all-beef frankfurters, crinkle-cut french fries, chargrilled hamburgers and other select Nathan's menu items, including a newly formulated kids' menu. Arthur Treachers' products are also featured in the Rockville Centre restaurant. As of March 31, 2002, we decided to sell of our company-operated Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurant in Rockville Centre, New York and are actively engaged in negotiations with a prospective purchaser. In April 2002, we opened a new limited-menu Kenny Rogers food court outlet, as part of a major remodeling of a large Company-owned Nathan's facility in Oceanside, New York. International Franchising As of March 31, 2002, our franchisees operated 90 units in 14 foreign countries having significant representations within Malaysia, the Philippines, and the Middle-East. The vast majority of foreign operations consist of Kenny Rogers Roasters units, although our Nathan's and Miami Subs restaurant concepts also have foreign franchise operations. During the current fiscal year, our international franchising program opened 11 Roasters as follows: four in the Philippines and seven in Malaysia. To date, we also executed Letters of Intent to enter into Master Development Agreements for the rights to China, Japan, India and Turkey and are currently in various stages of discussions for development in other foreign countries. We may grant exclusive territorial rights, in foreign countries, based upon compliance with a pre-determined development schedule and would require that an exclusivity fee be conveyed for these rights. We plan to develop internationally through the use of master franchising agreements based upon individual or combined use of all three restaurant concepts. 8
Location Summary The following table shows the number of our company-owned and franchised or licensed units in operation or under development at March 31, 2002 and their geographical distribution: Franchise Location Company or License(1) Total - -------- ------- ------------ ----- Alabama - 4 4 Arizona - 3 3 California - 5 5 Colorado - 1 1 Connecticut - 4 4 Florida 4 112 116 Georgia - 3 3 Idaho - 1 1 Indiana - 1 1 Maryland - 1 1 Massachusetts - 1 1 Michigan - 2 2 Minnesota - 2 2 Missouri - 4 4 Nevada - 4 4 New Jersey 2 44 46 New York 16 54 70 North Carolina - 15 15 Pennsylvania - 6 6 South Carolina - 2 2 Tennessee - 1 1 Texas - 4 4 -- --- --- Domestic Subtotal 22 274 296 -- --- --- International Locations Bahamas - 2 2 Brunei - 1 1 Canada - 3 3 Cypress - 1 1 Dominican Republic - 2 2 Egypt - 4 4 Indonesia - 1 1 Israel - 1 1 Malaysia - 30 30 Philippines - 35 35 Puerto Rico - 2 2 Saudi Arabia - 2 2 Singapore - 4 4 United Arab Emirates - 2 2 -- --- --- International Subtotal - 90 90 -- --- --- Grand Total 22 364 386 -- --- ---
(1) Includes 3 units operating by third parties pursuant to management agreements and does not include our Branded Product Program. 9Branded Product Program The "Branded Product Program" was launched during fiscal 1998. The program was expressly created to provide a new vehicle for the sale of Nathan's hot dogs and other proprietary items. Through the program, Nathan's provides qualified foodservice operators in a variety of venues, the opportunity to capitalize on Nathan's superior signature products and valued brand equity. In conjunction with the program, the operators are granted a limited use of the Nathan's trademark, as well as Nathan's point of purchase materials. We sell products either directly to the end users, or to various foodservice distributors who provide the product to retailers. As of March 2002, the branded product program was comprised of approximately 1,500 points of sale. The program is unique in its flexibility and broad appeal. Hot dogs are offered in a variety of sizes and even come packaged with buns for vending machine use. The Canteen Corporation, America's largest vending company, uses Nathan's packaged hot dogs throughout its system. During the past two years the locations offering the branded product have been significantly expanded. Today, Nathan's hot dogs are being offered by major hotel and casino operations such as Park Place Entertainment (Caesar's, Paris, Bally's, Flamingo, etc.), as well as all of the Trump Casino operations in Atlantic City, New Jersey. National movie theaters, such as, National Amusement and Muvico, now offer Nathan's at their concession stands. A wide variety of colleges and universities serve Nathan's hot dogs. Our product is also offered in the cafeteria at the House of Representatives and the Kennedy Space Center. Nathan's hot dog is the official hot dog of the New York Yankees for the 2001-2003 baseball seasons. Of particular significance is our recent expansion into the fast food arena, where Nathan's hot dogs are currently being offered at a variety of restaurants such as, Johnny Rockets, Flamers, and A&W Hot Dogs & More. As we expand the program, we continue to open new opportunities with high volume potential. In addition to over 75 airport locations, Nathan's is now offered on Amtrak Trains throughout the nation, as well as a number of highway travel plazas. Expansion Program We expect to continue opening new franchised units for each restaurant concept individually and on a co- branded basis, expanding product distribution through alternative means such as branded products or supermarket licensing arrangements, developing master franchising programs in foreign countries and continue introducing each restaurant concepts' signature products through co-branding efforts within our existing restaurant system. During fiscal 2003, we may selectively open new company-owned units, concentrated within the New York metropolitan area or in Southern Florida using our co-branded format. Existing company-owned units are principally located in the New York metropolitan area and Southern Florida market where we have extensive experience in operating restaurants. We may consider new opportunities in both traditional and captive market settings. We anticipate that we will open franchised units of all three restaurant concepts individually and develop new co-branded outlets. We have engaged an imaging and equipment design firm to assist us with the development of certain prototype restaurants. We expect that during fiscal 2003 our international development efforts will take on added dimensions as a result of the co-branding opportunities that we now offer. We believe that in addition to restaurant franchising of our three restaurant concepts, there is the opportunity to further increase revenues by offering master development agreements to qualified persons or entities allowing for the operation of franchised restaurants, subfranchising restaurants to others, licensing the manufacture of our signature products, selling our signature products through supermarkets and allowing for the further development of our Branded Product Program. Qualified persons or entities must have satisfactory foodservice experience managing multiple units, the appropriate infrastructure and the necessary financial resources to support the business development. 10
We will also seek to continue the growth of our Branded Product Program in fiscal 2003 through the addition of new points of sale for Nathan's hot dogs. We believe that as consumers look to assure confidence in the quality of the food that they purchase, there is great potential to increase our sales by converting existing sales of non-branded products into branded products throughout the foodservice industry. In addition, certain Miami Subs, Kenny Rogers Roasters and Nathan's products may be included as part of our Branded Product Program. Co-branding We believe that there is a substantial opportunity for co-branding among restaurant concepts. In addition to the three restaurant concepts that we own, we also maintain certain co-branding rights for the use of the brand "Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips" within the United States. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, we began to implement our co-branding strategy within our existing restaurant system. "Host Restaurants" continue to operate pursuant to their current franchise agreements. Existing franchisees executed an addendum to their agreement which defined the terms of our co-branding relationship. As part of our co-branding strategy for the Miami Subs franchise system, an entirely new marketing approach was developed to include the name "Miami Subs Plus". In January 2001, we began to implement our co-branding strategy by offering to the Miami Subs franchise community the ability to add Nathan's, Kenny Rogers Roasters and Arthur Treachers' signature products to their menus. During fiscal 2003, we intend to focus on co-branding within the Nathan's system by adding the Kenny Rogers brand , and including the Arthur Treacher's brand at additional Nathan's restaurants. To date, the Arthur Treacher's brand has been introduced within 133 Nathan's, Kenny Rogers Roasters and Miami Subs restaurants, the Nathan's brand has been added to the menu of 88 Miami Subs and Kenny Rogers restaurants, while the Kenny Rogers Roasters brand has been introduced into 79 Miami Subs and Nathan's restaurants. We have introduced the Miami Subs brand in three company-owned Nathan's and one Kenny Rogers franchised restaurants. We believe that our brand offerings compliment each other and will enable us to market franchises of co- branded units and continue co-branding within existing franchised units. The Nathan's and Miami Subs products are typically stronger during lunch while the Kenny Rogers Roasters and Arthur Treachers' products are generally stronger during dinner. We expect to market co-branded units within the United States and internationally. We believe that a multi- branded restaurant concept offering strong lunch and dinner day parts will be very appealing to both consumers and potential franchisees. Such restaurants should allow the operator to increase sales and leverage the cost of real estate and other fixed costs which may provide superior investment returns as compared to many restaurants that are single branded. Licensing Program We license SMG, Inc. to produce packaged hot dogs and other meat products according to Nathans' proprietary recipes and spice formulations, and to use "Nathan's Famous" and related trademarks to sell these products on an exclusive basis in the United States to supermarkets, groceries and other outlets, thereby providing foods for off-premises consumption. The SMG agreement expires in 2014 and provides for royalties ranging between 3% to 5% of sales. The percentage varies based on sales volume, with escalating minimum royalties. Earned royalties of approximately $1,724,000 in fiscal 2002 exceeded the contractual minimum established under the agreement. We believe that the overall exposure of the brand and opportunity for consumers to enjoy the "Nathan's Famous" hot dog in their homes helps promote "Nathan's Famous" restaurant patronage. Supermarket sales of our hot dogs are concentrated in the New York metropolitan area, New England, Florida, California and certain other select markets. Royalties from SMG provided the majority of our fiscal 2002 retail license revenues. 11
In November 1997, we executed a license agreement with J.J. Mathews & Co, Inc. to market a variety of Nathan's packaged menu items for sale within supermarkets and groceries. The agreement called for us to receive royalties based upon sales, subject to minimum annual royalties, as specified in the agreement. During fiscal 2001 the license agreement was terminated. During fiscal 2002, certain products were also distributed under licensing agreements with Gold Pure Food Product's Co., Inc. and Herman Pickle Packers, Inc. Both companies licensed the "Nathan's Famous" name for the manufacture and sale of various condiments including mustard, salsa, sauerkraut and pickles. These products have been distributed on a limited basis. Fees and royalties earned during fiscal 2002 have not been significant. We also license the manufacture of the proprietary spices and marinade which are used to produce Nathans' hot dogs and Kenny Rogers chicken. During fiscal 2002 and 2001, we earned $249,000 and $284,000, respectively, under these agreements. Provisions and Supplies Our proprietary hot dogs are produced by SMG, Inc. in accordance with Nathans' recipes, quality standards and proprietary spice formulations. John Morrell & Company, our licensee prior to SMG, has retained the right to produce Nathans' proprietary spice formulations. Kenny Rogers Roasters proprietary marinade and spice formulations are produced by McCormick and Co., Inc. All other company provisions are purchased and obtained from multiple sources to prevent disruption in supply and to obtain competitive prices. We approve all products and product specifications. We negotiate directly with our suppliers on behalf of the entire system for all primary food ingredients and beverage products sold in the restaurants to ensure adequate supply of high quality items at competitive prices. We utilize a unified source for the distribution needs of all of our restaurant concepts pursuant to a national food distribution contract with Marriott Distribution Services. This agreement enables our restaurant operators to order and receive deliveries for the majority of their food and paper products directly through this distributor. We believe that this arrangement is more efficient and cost effective than having multiple distributors. Marketing, Promotion and Advertising We maintain advertising funds for local, regional and national advertising under the Nathan's Famous Systems, Inc. Franchise Agreement. Nathans' franchisees are generally required to spend on local marketing activities or contribute to the advertising funds up to 2.5% of restaurant sales for advertising and promotion. Marriott and National Restaurant Management, Inc. are among the current franchisees who are not subject to this requirement. Franchisee contributions to the advertising fund for national marketing support are generally based upon the type of restaurant and its location. The difference, if any, between 2.5% and the contribution to the advertising fund must be expended on local programs approved by us as to form, content and method of dissemination. Throughout fiscal 2002, Nathans' primary marketing emphasis continued to be focused on local store marketing campaigns featuring a value oriented strategy supplemented with promotional "Limited Time Offers." We anticipate that near-term marketing efforts for Nathan's will continue to emphasize local store marketing activities. In addition, SMG promotes and advertises the "Nathan's Famous" packaged retail brand, particularly in the New York metropolitan area, California, the greater Boston area, Phoenix, Arizona and throughout Florida. We believe that the advertising by SMG increases brand recognition and thereby indirectly benefits Nathan's restaurants in the areas in which SMG conducts its campaigns. From time to time, we also participate with SMG in joint promotional activities. We maintain a separate Production Advertising Fund for the creation and development of advertising, marketing, public relations, research and related programs for the Miami Subs system, as well as for other activities that we may deem appropriate. Franchisee and company-operated restaurants contribute .5% of each restaurants' gross sales to this fund. In addition, we maintain certain Regional Advertising Funds in which franchised and company-operated restaurants in the region contribute 1.75% of each restaurants' gross sales. If a restaurant 12
is not located in an area where a regional advertising fund has been established, the franchisee or company-operated restaurant is required to spend at least 1.75% of the restaurants' gross sales for local advertising. Our Miami Subs advertising programs principally use radio and print, and carry the theme that Miami Subs offers a variety of menu selections at competitive, fast food prices. Our Miami Subs radio advertisements are broadcast principally in markets where there are sufficient restaurants to benefit from such advertisements. In the summer 2001, we used a television, radio and newsprint campaign to introduce the new co-branded Miami Subs Plus concept in Southern Florida. The physical facility of each Miami Subs restaurant represents a key component of our Miami Subs marketing strategy. The restaurants have well-lit exteriors featuring a distinctive roof design, an abundance of pastel neon lights and a lively interior featuring a tropical motif which we believe creates strong appeal during the day and night. We maintain separate advertising funds on behalf of the Kenny Rogers Roasters franchise system for regional and national advertising under the NF Roasters Corp. Franchise Agreement. Franchisees who signed up to participate in the new system are required to contribute to the advertising funds .50% of restaurant sales for advertising and promotion for the year April 1, 1999 through March 31, 2000 and .75% of restaurant sales for advertising and promotion thereafter. However, contributions to the marketing fund for the years April 1, 2000 through March 31, 2003 have been waived. New franchisees will be expected to spend on local marketing activities or contribute to the advertising funds up to 2.5% of restaurant sales for advertising and promotion. During the year, the Kenny Rogers Roasters' primary marketing focus has been toward utilizing promotional "Limited Time Offers". We anticipate that near-term marketing efforts for Kenny Rogers Roasters will continue to emphasize local store marketing activities. Government Regulation We are subject to Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") regulation and several state laws which regulate the offer and sale of franchises. We are also subject to a number of state laws which regulate substantive aspects of the franchisor-franchisee relationship. The FTC's "Trade Regulation Rule Concerning Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising and Business Opportunity Ventures" requires us to disclose certain information to prospective franchisees. Fifteen states, including New York, also require similar disclosure. While the FTC rule does not require registration or filing of the disclosure document, fourteen states require franchisors to register the disclosure document (or obtain exemptions from that requirement) before offering or selling a franchise. The laws of seventeen other states require some form of registration under "business opportunity" laws, which sometimes apply to franchisors such as the franchisor of the Nathan's Famous, Miami Subs, and Kenny Rogers Roasters systems. Laws that regulate one or another aspect of the franchisor-franchisee relationship presently exist in twenty-one states and the District of Columbia. These laws regulate the franchise relationship by, for example, requiring the franchisor to deal with its franchisees in good faith, prohibiting interference with the right of free association among franchisees, limiting the imposition of standards of performance on a franchisee, and regulating discrimination among franchisees in charges, royalties or fees. These laws have not precluded us from seeking franchisees in any given area. Although these laws may also restrict a franchisor in the termination of a franchise agreement by, for example, requiring "good cause" to exist as a basis for the termination, advance notice to the franchisee of the termination, an opportunity to cure a default and repurchase of inventory or other compensation, these provisions have not had a significant effect on our operations. We are not aware of any pending franchise legislation in the U.S. that we believe is likely to significantly affect our operations. We believe that our operations comply substantially with the FTC rule and state franchise laws. 13
Each company-owned and franchised restaurant is subject to regulation by federal agencies and to licensing and regulation by state and local health, sanitation, safety, fire and other departments. Difficulties or failures in obtaining the required licenses or approvals could delay or prevent the opening of a new restaurant. We are also subject to the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs minimum wages, overtime, working conditions and other matters. We are also subject to other federal and state environmental regulations, which have not had a material effect on our operations. More stringent and varied requirements of local governmental bodies with respect to zoning, land use and environmental factors could delay or prevent development of new restaurants in particular locations. In addition, the federal Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") applies with respect to the design, construction and renovation of all restaurants in the United States. Compliance with the ADA's requirements could delay or prevent the development of, or renovations to, restaurants in certain locations, as well as add to the cost of such development or renovation. Each of the companies which manufactures, supplies or sells our products is subject to regulation by federal agencies and to licensing and regulation by state and local health, sanitation, safety and other departments. Difficulties or failures by these companies in obtaining the required licenses or approvals could adversely effect our revenues which are generated from these companies. Alcoholic beverage control regulations require each restaurant that sells such products to apply to a state authority and, in certain locations, county and municipal authorities, for a license or permit to sell alcoholic beverages on the premises. Typically, licenses must be renewed annually and may be revoked or suspended for cause at any time. Alcoholic beverage control regulations relate to numerous aspects of the daily operations of the restaurants, including minimum age of customers and employees, hours of operation, advertising, wholesale purchasing, inventory control and handling, storage and dispensing of alcoholic beverages. At March 31, 2002, we offered for sale beer or wine in six of our existing company-operated restaurants. Each of these restaurants have current alcoholic beverage licenses permitting the sale of these beverages. We have never had an alcoholic beverage license revoked. We may be subject in certain states to "dram-shop" statutes, which generally provide a person injured by an intoxicated person the right to recover damages from an establishment which wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to such person. We carry liquor liability coverage as part of our existing comprehensive general liability insurance and have never been named as a defendant in a lawsuit involving "dram-shop" statutes. We believe that we operate in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing our operations. Employees At March 31, 2002, we had 557 employees, of whom 65 were corporate management and administrative employees, 75 were restaurant managers and 417 were hourly full-time and part-time food-service employees. Food-service employees at five locations are represented by Local 1115-NY, a division of District 1115, AFL - CIO CLC, under various agreements which will expire in April 2003. We consider our employee relations to be good and have not suffered any strike or work stoppage for more than 30 years. We provide a training program for managers and assistant managers of our new company-owned and franchised restaurants. Hourly food workers are trained, on site, by managers and crew trainers following company practices and procedures outlined in our operating manuals. Trademarks We hold trademark and service mark registrations for NATHAN'S FAMOUS, NATHAN'S and Design, NATHAN'S FAMOUS SINCE 1916 and SINCE 1916 NATHAN'S FAMOUS within the United States, with some of these marks holding corresponding foreign trademark and service mark registrations in more than 20 jurisdictions. We also hold various related marks for restaurant services and some food items. 14
We have registered the marks "MIAMI SUBS AND DESIGN" and "MIAMI SUBS GRILL AND DESIGN" with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In addition, the marks have been registered in approximately 50 foreign countries. We have also filed the MIAMI SUBS PLUS trademark on February 15, 2001 and an Amendment to Alleged Use on May 21, 2001. MIAMI SUBS PLUS is a pending application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. It generally takes approximately 18 months for the approval of an application. We hold trademark and service mark registrations for "KENNY ROGERS ROASTERS", "KENNY ROGERS ROASTERS WOOD FIRE ROASTED CHICKEN & DESIGN", " DOWN RIGHT KICKIN BBQ CHICKEN", "EVERYONE ELSE IS JUST PLAIN CHICKEN", "THERE'S GOODNESS HERE", "YOU'RE GONNA LOVE THIS FOOD", "YOUR HEART IS IN THE RIGHT PLACE", "KENNY ROGERS TAKE IT HOME & DESIGN" and "KENNY ROGERS ROASTERS EXPRESS & DESIGN" within the United States. Some of these marks are covered by corresponding foreign trademark and service mark registrations in more than 80 jurisdictions. The "Kenny Rogers Roasters" marks are subject to the terms of an April 5, 1993 license from Mr. Kenny Rogers; that license agreement was assigned to us on April 1, 1999, when we purchased certain assets relating to the "Kenny Rogers Roasters" franchise system. We believe that our trademarks and service marks provide significant value to us and are an important factor in the marketing of our products and services. We believe that we do not infringe on the trademarks or other intellectual property rights of any third parties. Competition The fast food restaurant industry is highly competitive and can be significantly affected by many factors, including changes in local, regional or national economic conditions, changes in consumer tastes, consumer concerns about the nutritional quality of quick-service food and increases in the number of, and particular locations of, competing restaurants. Factors such as inflation, increases in food, labor and energy costs, the availability and cost of suitable sites, fluctuating interest and insurance rates, state and local regulations and licensing requirements and the availability of an adequate number of hourly paid employees can also adversely affect the fast food restaurant industry. Our restaurants compete with numerous restaurants and drive-in units operating on both a national and local basis, including major national chains with greater financial and other resources than ours. Changes in pricing or other marketing strategies by these competitors can have an adverse impact on our sales, earnings and growth. We also compete with local restaurants and diners on the basis of menu diversity, food quality, price, size, site location and name recognition. There is also active competition for management personnel as well as suitable commercial sites for restaurants. We believe that our emphasis on our signature products and the reputation of these products for taste and quality set us apart from our major competitors. As fast food companies have experienced flattening growth rates and declining average sales per restaurant, some of them have adopted "value pricing" and or deep discount strategies. These strategies could have the effect of drawing customers away from companies which do not engage in discount pricing and could also negatively impact the operating margins of competitors which attempt to match their competitors' price reductions. We have introduced our own form of "value pricing," selling combinations of different menu items for a total price lower than the usual sale price of the individual items and other forms of price sensitive promotions. We have expanded our value pricing strategy by offering multi-sized alternatives to our value priced combo meals. Extensive price discounting in the fast food industry could have an adverse effect on us. We also compete for the sale of franchises with many franchisors of restaurants and other business concepts to qualified and financially capable franchisees and with numerous companies for the sale and distribution of our licensed hot dogs and other packaged foods, within supermarkets, primarily on the basis of reputation, flavor, quality and price. 15
Item 2. Properties - ------ ---------- Our principal executive offices consist of approximately 9,700 sq. ft. of leased space in a modern, high-rise office building in Westbury, New York which expires in November 2009. We also own Miami Subs' regional office consisting of approximately 8,500 sq. ft. in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. We currently own three restaurant properties consisting of 2,650 sq. ft. Nathan's restaurant, at 86th Street in Brooklyn, New York located on a 25,000 sq. ft. lot, a 2,400 sq. ft. Miami Subs restaurant in Largo, FL located on a 47,000 sq. ft. lot and a 2,600 sq. Ft. Miami Subs restaurant in Miami, FL located on a 25,000 sq. ft. lot. At March 31, 2002, other company-owned restaurants which were operating or developed were located in leased space with terms expiring as shown in the following table: Current Lease Approximate Location Expiration Date Square Footage -------- --------------- -------------- Nathan's Restaurants -------------------- Coney Island Brooklyn, NY December 2007 10,000 Coney Island Boardwalk Brooklyn, NY October 2002 440 Kings Plaza Shopping Center Brooklyn, NY July 2010 4,200 Long Beach Road Oceanside, NY May 2011 7,300 Central Park Avenue Yonkers, NY April 2010 10,000 Jericho Turnpike Commack, NY March 2003 3,200 Hempstead Turnpike Levittown, NY September 2004 4,100 Broad Hollow Road Farmingdale, NY April 2003 2,200 Jericho Home Depot Jericho, NY September 2004 1,500 Copiague Home Depot Copiague, NY April 2005 1,200 Flushing Home Depot Flushing, NY June 2005 1,500 Elmont Home Depot Elmont, NY October 2005 1,500 Union Home Depot Union, NJ January 2008 960 Staten Island Home Depot Staten Island, NY July 2007 1,680 Brooklyn Home Depot Brooklyn, NY March 2008 950 Kenny Rogers Roasters --------------------- Commack Roasters Commack, NY October 2013 3,100 Rockville Centre Roasters Rockville Centre, NY April 2018 4,000 Miami Subs Restaurants ---------------------- 17th Street Ft. Lauderdale, FL August 2003 3,000 Lauderhill Lauderhill, FL May 2007 4,000 South Miami Miami, FL August 2006 3,500 Lejune and 11th Miami, FL September 2002 2,500 Leases for Nathan's restaurants typically provide for a base rent plus real estate taxes, insurance and other expenses and, in some cases, provide for an additional percentage rent based on the restaurants' revenues. Many of the Nathan's leases also provide for renewal options ranging between five and 25 years upon expiration of the prime lease. We assumed the leases for the two properties operated as Kenny Rogers Roasters from the previous restaurant operator. These leases have remaining terms of 11 and 12 years and also provide for a base rent plus real estate taxes, insurance and other expenses. We are currently seeking to sell the Rockville Centre restaurant and terminate the lease. 16
Properties leased by Miami Subs restaurants generally provide for an initial lease term of up to 20 years and renewal terms of five to 20 years. The leases generally provide for fixed rents plus adjustments based on changes in the consumer price index or percentage rentals on gross sales. Restaurants and other facilities are leased or sub-leased to franchisees or others on terms which are generally similar to the terms in our lease with the third-party landlord, except that in certain cases the rent has been increased. We remain liable for all lease costs when properties are sub-leased to franchisees or others. At March 31, 2002, we were the sublessor to 34 properties pursuant to these arrangements, 11 of the restaurants leased/sub-leased to franchisees or others are located outside of Florida. Aggregate rental expense, net of sublease income, under all current leases amounted to $2,734,000 in fiscal 2002. Item 3. Legal Proceedings - ------ ----------------- We and our subsidiaries are from time to time involved in ordinary and routine litigation. We are also involved in the following litigation: Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Nathan's Famous Operating Corp. were named as two of three defendants in an action commenced in July 2001, in the Supreme Court of New York, Westchester County. According to the amended complaint, the plaintiffs, a minor and her mother, are seeking damages in the amount of $17 million against Nathan's Famous and Nathan's Famous Operating Corp. and one of Nathan's Famous' former employees claiming that the Nathan's entities failed to properly supervise minor employees, failed to monitor its supervisory personnel, and were negligent in hiring, retaining and promoting the individual defendant, who allegedly molested, harassed and raped the minor plaintiff, who was also an employee. On May 29, 2002, as a result of a mediation, this action was settled, subject to court approval. In the event the court approves the settlement, the plaintiffs will be paid $650,000. Elizabeth B. Jackson and Joseph Jackson commenced an action, in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida in September 2001 against Miami Subs and EKFD Corporation, a Miami Subs franchisee ("the franchisee") claiming negligence in connection with a slip and fall which allegedly occurred on the premises of the franchisee for unspecified damages. Pursuant to the terms of the Miami Subs Franchise Agreement, the franchisee is obligated to indemnify Miami Subs and hold them harmless against claims asserted and procured an insurance policy which named Miami Subs as an additional insured. Miami Subs has denied any liability to Plaintiffs and has made demand upon the franchisee's insurer to indemnify and defend against the claims asserted. The insurer has agreed to indemnify and defend Miami Subs and has assumed the defense of this action for Miami Subs. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders - ------ --------------------------------------------------- None. 17
PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters - ------ -------------------------------------------------------------------- Common Stock Prices Our common stock began trading on the over-the-counter market on February 26, 1993 and is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market System ("Nasdaq") under the symbol "NATH." The following table sets forth the high and low closing share prices per share for the periods indicated: High Low - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 First quarter $ 3.50 $ 2.87 Second quarter 3.55 3.10 Third quarter 3.60 3.07 Fourth quarter 3.62 3.21 Fiscal year ended March 25, 2001 First quarter $ 4.00 $ 2.75 Second quarter 3.94 2.88 Third quarter 3.81 2.56 Fourth quarter 3.88 2.88 At June 7, 2002 the closing price per share for our common stock, as reported by Nasdaq was $3.8820. Dividend Policy We have not declared or paid a cash dividend on our common stock since our initial public offering. It is our Board of Directors' policy to retain all available funds to finance the development and growth of our business. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our earnings and financial requirements. Shareholders As of June 7, 2002, we had 830 shareholders of record, excluding shareholders whose shares were held by brokerage firms, depositories and other institutional firms in "street name" for their customers. 18
Equity Compensation Plan Information The following chart summarizes the options and warrants outstanding and available to be issued at March 31, 2002: - ------------------------------ ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- Plan Category Number of securities to be Weighted-average exercise Number of securities issued upon exercise of price of outstanding remaining available for outstanding options and options and warrants future issuance under warrants equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (a) (b) (c) - ------------------------------ ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1,339,896 $4.8083 153,666 - ------------------------------ ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 800,000 $3.5529 -0- - ------------------------------ ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- Total 2,139,896 $4.3390 153,666 - ------------------------------ ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data - ------- ------------------------------------- Fiscal years ended March 31, March 25, March 26, March 28, March 29 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 ------------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands, except per share amounts) Statement of Operations Data: Revenues: Sales $32,349 $34,799 $29,642 $23,964 $22,971 Franchise fees and royalties 7,944 8,814 5,906 3,230 3,062 License royalties, investment and other income 4,106 3,561 2,343 1,953 2,393 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Total revenues 44,399 47,174 37,891 29,147 28,426 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Costs and Expenses: Cost of sales 21,643 22,530 18,977 14,932 14,017 Restaurant operating expenses 7,788 8,964 8,208 5,780 6,411 Depreciation and amortization 1,661 1,791 1,358 1,065 1,035 Amortization of intangible assets 888 839 716 384 384 General and administrative expenses 9,292 8,978 8,222 4,722 4,755 19
Interest expense 256 310 198 1 6 Impairment of long-lived assets 685 127 465 302 --- Impairment of notes receivable 185 151 840 --- --- Other (income) expense (210) 462 427 (349) --- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Total costs and expenses 42,188 44,152 39,411 26,837 26,608 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes 2,211 3,022 (1,520) 2,310 1,818 Provision (benefit) for income taxes 962 1,416 (250) (418) 290 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Net income (loss) 1,249 1,606 ($1,270) $2,728 $1,528 =================================================================== Per Share Data: Net income (loss) Basic $0.18 $0.23 ($0.22) $0.58 $0.32 Diluted $0.18 $0.23 ($0.22) $0.57 $0.32 Dividends ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share Basic 7,048 7,059 5,881 4,722 4,722 Diluted (1) 7,083 7,098 5,881 4,753 4,749 Balance Sheet Data at End of Fiscal Year: Working capital (deficit) $ 9,565 $5,210 ($ 322) $ 3,708 $ 6,105 Total assets 48,745 51,826 48,583 31,250 29,539 Long term debt, net of current maturities 1,220 1,789 3,131 0 9 Stockholders' equity $36,145 $35,031 $33,347 $26,348 $23,586 =================================================================== Selected Restaurant Operating Data: Systemwide Restaurant Sales: Company-owned $ 27,484 $30,946 $27,478 $21,981 $22,332 Franchised 185,389 208,889 152,627 64,178 58,802 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Total $212,873 $239,835 $180,105 $86,159 $81,134 =================================================================== Number of Units Open at End of Fiscal Year: Company-owned 22 25 32 25 27 Franchised 364 386 415 163 156 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 386 411 447 188 183 =================================================================== Notes to Selected Financial Data
(1) Common stock equivalents have been excluded from the computation for the year ended March 26, 2000 as the impact of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. 20Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results - ------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- of Operations ------------- Introduction As used in this Report, the terms "we", "us", "our" and "Nathan's" mean Nathan's Famous, Inc. and its subsidiaries (unless the context indicates a different meaning). During the fiscal year ended March 26, 2000, we completed two acquisitions that provided us with two highly recognized brands. On April 1, 1999, we became the franchisor of the Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurant system by acquiring the intellectual property rights, including trademarks, recipes and franchise agreements of Roasters Corp. and Roasters Franchise Corp. On September 30, 1999, we acquired the remaining 70% of the outstanding common stock of Miami Subs Corporation we did not already own. Our revenues are generated primarily from operating company-owned restaurants and franchising the Nathan's, Miami Subs and Kenny Rogers restaurant concepts, licensing agreements for the sale of Nathan's products within supermarkets and selling products under Nathan's Branded Product Program. The Branded Product Program enables foodservice operators to offer Nathans' hot dogs and other proprietary items for sale within their facilities. In conjunction with this program, foodservice operators are granted a limited use of the Nathans' trademark with respect to the sale of hot dogs and certain other proprietary food items and paper goods. In addition to plans for expansion through franchising and our Branded Product Program, Nathan's is continuing to capitalize on the co-branding opportunities within its existing restaurant system. To date, the Arthur Treacher's brand has been introduced within 133 Nathan's, Kenny Rogers Roasters and Miami Subs restaurants, the Nathan's brand has been added to the menu of 88 Miami Subs and Kenny Rogers restaurants, while the Kenny Rogers Roasters brand has been introduced into 79 Miami Subs and Nathan's restaurants. We have begun testing the Miami Subs brand in three company-owned Nathan's restaurants and one Kenny Rogers franchised restaurant. In connection with our acquisition of Miami Subs, we determined that up to 18 underperforming restaurants would be closed pursuant to our divestiture plan. Through March 31, 2002, we have terminated leases on 15 of those properties. We continue to market two of those properties for sale and terminated the lease for the last unit upon the lease expiration in May 2002. We also terminated 10 additional leases for properties outside of the divestiture plan. In the wake of the events of September 11, 2001, we have experienced lower sales at company-owned restaurants and lower royalties from franchised restaurants that operate in markets which are significant tourist destinations such as Las Vegas and South Florida. During the initial months subsequent to September 11, we realized declines at our franchised restaurants operating at airports throughout the United States as a result of the overall decline in airline traffic. At March 31, 2002, our combined system consisted of 364 franchised or licensed units, 22 company-owned units and approximately 1,500 Nathan's Branded Product points of sale that feature Nathan's world famous all-beef hot dogs, located in 39 states, the District of Columbia and 14 foreign countries. At March 31, 2002, our company-owned restaurant system included 16 Nathan's units, four Miami Subs units and two Kenny Rogers Roasters units, as compared to 17 Nathan's units, six Miami Subs units and two Kenny Rogers Roasters units at March 25, 2001. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our consolidated financial statements and the notes to our consolidated financial statements contain information that is pertinent to management's discussion and analysis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We believe the following critical accounting policies involve additional management judgement due to the sensitivity of the methods, assumptions and estimates necessary in determining the related asset and liability amounts. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," requires management judgements regarding the future operating and disposition plans for underperforming assets, and estimates of expected realizable values for assets to be sold. The application of SFAS 121 has 21
affected the amounts and timing of charges to operating results in recent years. We evaluate possible impairment of each restaurant individually, and record an impairment charge whenever we determine that impairment factors exist. We consider a history of restaurant operating losses to be the primary indicator of potential impairment of a restaurant's carrying value. We have identified certain restaurants that have been impaired and recorded impairment charges of approximately $685,000 (relating to two restaurants), $127,000 (relating to one restaurant) and $465,000 (relating to three restaurants) in the consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," requires management judgements regarding the future collectibility of notes receivable and the underlying fair market value of collateral. We consider the following factors when evaluating a note for impairment: 1) indications that the borrower is experiencing business problems such as operating losses, marginal working capital, inadequate cash flow or business interruptions; 2) whether the loan is secured by collateral that is not readily marketable; or 3) whether the collateral is susceptible to deterioration in realizable value. When determining possible impairment, we also assess our future intention to extend certain leases beyond the minimum lease term and the note holder's ability to meet its obligation over that extended term. We have identified certain notes receivable that have been impaired and recorded impairment charges of approximately $185,000 (relating to two loans), $151,000 (relating to one loan) and $840,000 (relating to six loans) in the consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. In the normal course of business, we extend credit to franchisees for the payment of ongoing royalties and to trade customers of our Branded Product Program. Notes and accounts receivable, net, as shown on our consolidated balance sheets were net of allowances for doubtful accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through analysis of the aging of accounts receivable at the date of the financial statements, assessment of collectibility based upon historical trends and an evaluation of the impact of current and projected economic conditions. In the event that the collectibility of a receivable is doubtful, the associated revenue is not recorded until the facts and circumstances change in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin SAB No 101, "Revenue Recognition". We are self-insured for portions of our general liability coverage. As part of our risk management strategy, our insurance programs include deductibles for each incident and in the aggregate for a policy year. As such, we accrue estimates of our ultimate self insurance costs throughout the policy year. These estimates have been developed based upon our historical trends, however, the final cost of many of these claims may not be known for five years or longer. Accordingly, our annual self insurance costs may be subject to adjustment from previous estimates as facts and circumstances change. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives will no longer be amortized but will be reviewed annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) for impairment, requiring significant management judgement. Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). The amortization provisions of SFAS 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. There are also transition provisions that apply to business combinations completed before July 1, 2001, that were accounted for by the purchase method. With respect to its goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1, 2001, Nathan's is required to adopt SFAS 142 effective in its next fiscal year, commencing April 1, 2002. Nathan's will no longer amortize existing goodwill and certain intangibles having indefinite lives, thus reducing amortization expense by approximately $600,000 per year. We expect to complete our impairment analysis during the first quarter fiscal 2003 and expect to recognize an impairment charge of approximately $12 to $13 million upon adoption of SFAS No. 142. Results of Operations Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2002 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 25, 2001 Revenues - -------- Total sales decreased by 7.0% or $2,450,000 to $32,349,000 for the fifty-three weeks ended March 31, 2002 ("fiscal 2002 period") as compared to $34,799,000 for the fifty-two weeks ended March 25, 2001 ("fiscal 2001 period"). Sales from the Branded Product Program increased by 26.2% or $1,011,000 to $4,864,000 for the fiscal 2002 period as compared to sales of $3,853,000 in the 22
fiscal 2001 period. Company-owned restaurant sales decreased 11.2% or $3,461,000 to $27,485,000 from $30,946,000 primarily due to operating nine fewer company-owned stores as compared to the prior fiscal period and lower sales at the two new restaurants that began operating during the fiscal 2001 period. These reductions were partially offset by sales during the fiscal 2002 period from a restaurant that was closed for renovation during the fiscal 2001 period and increased sales at the Coney Island restaurant during the summer season. Fiscal 2002 was a 53 week reporting period while fiscal 2001 was a 52 week reporting period. Approximately $390,000 in restaurant sales were generated during the additional week of operations. The unit reduction is the result of our franchising two company-owned restaurants, transferring one company-owned restaurant to a franchisee pursuant to a management agreement, closing four unprofitable company-owned units (including three Miami Subs restaurants pursuant to our divesture plan), selling one unit pursuant to an order of condemnation and closing one unit due to its lease expiration. The financial impact associated with these nine restaurants lowered restaurant sales by $3,749,000 and improved restaurant operating profits by $30,000 versus the fiscal 2001 period, excluding any one time gains or royalties to be received from restaurants sold to franchisees. Comparable restaurant sales (consisting of 15 Nathan's and four Miami Subs restaurants that have been operating for 18 months or longer as of the beginning of the fiscal year) during the comparable 52 week period increased by 2.5% versus the fiscal 2001 period. Franchise fees and royalties decreased by 9.9% or $870,000 to $7,944,000 in the fiscal 2002 period compared to $8,814,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. Franchise royalties decreased by $1,299,000 or 16.1% to $6,761,000 in the fiscal 2002 period as compared to $8,060,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. Domestic franchise restaurant sales decreased by 11.2% to $185,389,000 in the fiscal 2002 period as compared to $208,889,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. The majority of this decline is due to fewer franchised restaurants operating during the fiscal 2002 period as compared to the fiscal 2001 period. During the initial months subsequent to September 11, 2001, we have experienced lower royalties from franchised restaurants that operate in markets which are significant tourist destinations, such as Las Vegas and South Florida, and from franchised restaurants operating at airports throughout the United States. Further contributing to the decline is an increase in the amount of royalties deemed to be unrealizable. At March 31, 2002, 364 franchised or licensed restaurants were operating as compared to 386 franchised or licensed restaurants at March 25, 2001. Franchise fee income derived from new openings and co-branding was $875,000 in the fiscal 2002 period as compared to $754,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. This increase was primarily attributable to the fees earned from the co-branding initiative within the existing restaurant system. During the fiscal 2002 period, 18 new franchised or licensed units opened and 47 units have been co- branded. During the fiscal 2002 period we realized $308,000 in connection with forfeited development fees. License royalties were $2,038,000 in the fiscal 2002 period as compared to $1,958,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. This increase is comprised of higher royalties earned from sales by SMG, Inc., Nathans' licensee for the sale of Nathan's frankfurters within supermarkets and club stores. Investment and other income was $2,068,000 in the fiscal 2002 period versus $1,603,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. During the fiscal 2002 period, Nathan's recognized net gains of 1,226,000 in connection with the sale of two company-owned restaurants and a third non-restaurant property. During the fiscal 2002 period, Nathans' investment and interest income was approximately $342,000 higher than in the fiscal 2001 period due primarily to differences in performance of the financial markets between the two periods. In the fiscal 2001 period, Nathan's recognized income of approximately $479,000 in connection with the introduction of a consolidated food distribution agreement and earned a $500,000 transfer fee in connection with a change in ownership of Nathan's licensee, SMG Inc. Costs and Expenses - ------------------ Cost of sales decreased by $887,000 to $21,643,000 in the fiscal 2002 period from $22,530,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. During the fiscal 2002 period, restaurant cost of sales were lower than the fiscal 2001 period by approximately $1,986,000. Restaurant cost of sales were reduced by approximately $2,423,000 as a result of operating fewer company-owned restaurants. Additionally, lower cost of sales at the two Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurants opened last year offset the higher costs at our comparable restaurants. Notwithstanding the lower costs and expenses of the two Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurants, these restaurants continued to underperform. Consequently, we have decided to sell the Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurant in Rockville Centre, New York. The cost of restaurant sales at our comparable units as a percentage of restaurant sales was 62.5% in the fiscal 2002 period as compared to 61.3% in the fiscal 2001 period due primarily to higher labor and related costs. Higher costs of approximately $1,100,000 were incurred in connection with the growth of our 23
Branded Product Program and higher product costs incurred for much of the fiscal 2002 period. During the first twenty-six weeks of fiscal 2002, commodity prices of our primary meat products were at their highest levels in recent years causing the majority of the cost increase. In response, we raised retail prices on a selective basis in an attempt to partially offset these increases. Beginning in the third quarter fiscal 2002 these costs were lowered to their historical levels. However, should costs escalate again for an extended period, we may determine to further examine our pricing structure to attempt to reduce the impact on our margins. Restaurant operating expenses decreased by $1,176,000 to $7,788,000 in the fiscal 2002 period from $8,964,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. Restaurant operating costs were lower in the fiscal 2002 period by approximately $1,357,000, as compared to the fiscal 2001 period as a result of operating fewer restaurants. Restaurant operating expenses of the two restaurants opened last year were $92,000 lower during the fiscal 2002 period due in part to the higher costs attributable to last years' openings. These reductions in restaurant operating expenses were partially offset by an increase of approximately $268,000 at the comparable restaurants which were primarily driven by higher marketing and insurance costs. Depreciation and amortization decreased by $130,000 to $1,661,000 in the fiscal 2002 period from $1,791,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. Lower depreciation expense of operating fewer company-owned restaurants during the fiscal 2002 period versus the fiscal 2001 period was partially offset by additional depreciation expense attributable to last year's capital spending. Amortization of intangibles increased by $49,000 to $888,000 in the fiscal 2002 period from $839,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. Amortization of intangibles increased as a result of last years' final purchase price allocation of the Miami Subs acquisition. General and administrative expenses increased by $314,000 to $9,292,000 in the fiscal 2002 period as compared to $8,978,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due primarily to higher legal and professional expenses of approximately $544,000, including a litigation expense of $450,000, and higher bad debts of approximately $76,000 which were partly offset by lower personnel and incentive compensation expense of approximately $389,000. Interest expense was $256,000 during the fiscal 2002 period as compared to $310,000 during the fiscal 2001 period. The reduction in interest expense relates primarily to the repayment of outstanding debt between the two periods. Impairment charges on fixed assets of $685,000 during the fiscal 2002 period and $127,000 during the fiscal 2001 period reflect write-downs relating to two under-performing stores in the fiscal 2002 period and one under- performing store in the fiscal 2001 period. Impairment charges on notes receivable of $185,000 during the fiscal 2002 period and $151,000 during the fiscal 2001 period relate to write-downs of two and one notes receivable, respectively. Other income of $210,000 in the fiscal 2002 period represents the reversal of a previously recorded litigation provision for an award that was settled, upon appeal, in our favor. Other expense of $462,000 during the fiscal 2001 period relates primarily to lease termination expenses of units that were not part of the final divestiture plan of $463,000. Income Tax Expense - ------------------ In the fiscal 2002 period, the income tax provision was $962,000 or 43.5% of income before income taxes as compared to $1,416,000 or 46.9% of income before income taxes in the fiscal 2001 period. Fiscal Year Ended March 25, 2001 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 26, 2000 Effective October 1, 1999, the results of Miami Subs Corporation have been included in the consolidated results of Nathan's Famous, Inc. Our results of operations for the 52 weeks ended March 26, 2000 included the operations of 24
Miami Subs for approximately 26 weeks as compared to including 52 weeks of such operations for the period ended March 25, 2001. The results of Miami Subs' operations for the twenty-six week period ended September 24, 2000 have been separately stated to quantify that impact on the fifty-two weeks of operations for the non-comparable period. Revenues - -------- Total sales increased by 17.4% or $5,157,000 to $34,799,000 for the fifty-two weeks ended March 25, 2001 ("fiscal 2001 period") as compared to $29,642,000 for the fifty-two weeks ended March 26, 2000 ("fiscal 2000 period"). Of the total increase, sales increased by $5,968,000 during the twenty-six week period ended September 24, 2000 as a result of the Miami Subs acquisition made last year, offset by a sales decline of $811,000 primarily due to the operation of 18 fewer company-owned stores as compared to the prior fiscal period which was partly offset by sales from newly opened restaurants and increased sales of our Branded Products. This unit reduction is the result of our franchising eight company-owned restaurants, transferring one company-owned restaurant to a franchisee pursuant to a management agreement, closing seven unprofitable company-owned units (including three Miami Subs restaurants pursuant to our divesture plan) and closing two units due to lease expirations. The financial impact associated with these 18 restaurants lowered restaurant sales by $4,299,000 and improved restaurant operating profits by $135,000 versus the fiscal 2000 period. Additionally, one unit was temporarily closed during part of the fiscal 2001 period for renovation. This unit re- opened in October 2000. Comparable restaurant sales of the company-owned Nathan's brand (neither Miami Subs nor Roasters company-owned restaurants were deemed to be comparable units based upon their period of operation under our ownership) also declined by 1.5% versus the fiscal 2000 period, due principally to weakness experienced at the Coney Island restaurant primarily attributable to the unfavorable weather conditions experienced earlier in the fiscal year. During the fiscal 2001 period, sales from two new company-owned restaurants were $2,343,000. Sales from the Branded Product Program increased by 78.1% to $3,853,000 for the fiscal 2001 period as compared to sales of $2,163,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. Franchise fees and royalties increased by 49.2% or $2,908,000 to $8,814,000 in the fiscal 2001 period compared to $5,906,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. Increases in franchise fees and royalties during the twenty-six week period ended September 24, 2000 resulting from the Miami Subs acquisition made last year was $2,397,000. Franchise sales of Nathan's three restaurant concepts increased by 36.9% to $208,889,000 in the fiscal 2001 period as compared to $152,627,000 in the fiscal 2000 period due primarily to the inclusion of Miami Subs franchise system sales for the entire fiscal 2001 period compared to twenty-six weeks for the fiscal 2000 period. Franchise royalties were $8,060,000 in the fiscal 2001 period as compared to $5,167,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. Franchise fee income derived from new unit openings and our co-branding initiative were $754,000 in the fiscal 2001 period as compared to $739,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. This increase was primarily attributable to the number of franchised units opened between the two periods, franchise fees earned from the co-branded restaurant conversions and the difference between expired franchise fees recognized into income. During the fiscal 2001 period, seventeen new franchised or licensed units opened. License royalties were $1,958,000 in the fiscal 2001 period as compared to $1,906,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. Royalties earned from the sale of Nathan's frankfurters within supermarkets and club stores were approximately $1,614,000 during the fiscal 2001 period as compared to $1,432,000 during the fiscal 2000 period. Royalties from the sale of proprietary spices and marinade were approximately $228,000 in the fiscal 2001 period as compared to $184,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. During the fiscal 2001 period, we terminated an agreement with a licensee which lowered our revenue for the fiscal 2001 period by approximately $125,000 as compared to the fiscal 2000 period. Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliate of $163,000 in the fiscal 2000 period represented Nathans' proportionate share of Miami Subs' net loss for the period March 1, 1999 through September 30, 1999, which has been reported on a one month lag since the acquisition of the 30% equity interest. Included in Miami Subs' net loss for the period were merger costs of $325,000. Investment and other income increased by $1,003,000 to $1,603,000 in the fiscal 2001 period versus $600,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. Increases in other income during the twenty-six week period ended September 24, 2000 as a result of the Miami Subs acquisition made last year was $392,000. During the fiscal 2001 period Nathan's recognized income of approximately $694,000 in connection with the introduction of a consolidated food distribution system for its three restaurant concepts and the ongoing recognition of deferred marketing support. The increase is also attributable to a transfer fee of $500,000 that was earned 25
in connection with a change in ownership of Nathan's licensee, SMG, Inc. Investment income was approximately $756,000 less than the fiscal 2000 period due primarily to the difference in performance of the financial markets between the two periods which was partially offset by higher interest income of approximately $195,000. Costs and Expenses - ------------------ Cost of sales increased by $3,553,000 to $22,530,000 in the fiscal 2001 period from $18,977,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. Of the total increase, cost of sales increased by $3,837,000 during the twenty-six week period ended September 24, 2000 as a result of the Miami Subs acquisition made last year. Cost of sales attributable to two new company-owned restaurants along with higher labor costs in the Nathan's brand partially offset lower costs of operating fewer company-owned restaurants totaling $2,969,000 as compared to the fiscal 2000 period. The cost of restaurant sales at Nathans' comparable units was 60.2% as a percentage of restaurant sales in the fiscal 2001 period as compared to 60.0% as a percentage of restaurant sales in the fiscal 2000 period due primarily to higher labor costs (neither Miami Subs nor Roasters company-owned restaurants were deemed to be comparable units based upon their period of operation under our ownership). Higher cost of sales totaling approximately $1,152,000 were incurred in connection with the growth of the Branded Product Program. Restaurant operating expenses increased by $756,000 to $8,964,000 in the fiscal 2001 period from $8,208,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. Restaurant operating expenses increased by $1,687,000 during the twenty-six week period ended September 24, 2000 as a result of the Miami Subs acquisition made last year. Lower costs of $1,622,000 were attributable to the closed company-owned restaurants as compared to the end of fiscal 2000 which were partially offset by higher costs of approximately $735,000 from operating two new Roasters restaurants and higher utility costs at company-owned comparable restaurants. Depreciation and amortization increased by $433,000 to $1,791,000 in the fiscal 2001 period from $1,358,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. Depreciation expense increased by $403,000 during the twenty-six week period ended September 24, 2000 as a result of the Miami Subs acquisition made last year. Depreciation expense attributable two new company-owned restaurants and the remaining capital spending for the fiscal 2001 period was partially offset by the lower depreciation expense of operating fewer company-owned restaurants versus the fiscal 2000 period. Amortization of intangibles increased by $123,000 to $839,000 in the fiscal 2001 period from $716,000 in the fiscal 2000 period primarily as a result of the Miami Subs acquisition made last year which is attributable to intangible assets acquired and the amortization of the excess purchase price. General and administrative expenses increased by $756,000 to $8,978,000 in the fiscal 2001 period as compared to $8,222,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. General and administrative expenses increased by approximately $1,562,000 during the twenty-six week period ended September 24, 2000 as a result of the Miami Subs acquisition made last year. General and administrative expenses, excluding the impact of Miami Subs, decreased by $806,000 primarily due to lower bad debt expense of approximately $739,000 and certain rebates of approximately $178,000, which were partially offset by higher spending in connection with personnel costs and incentive compensation of approximately $245,000. Interest expense was $310,000 during the fiscal 2001 period as compared to $198,000 during the fiscal 2000 period. Interest expense increased principally due to the different periods of time that Miami Subs has been owned by Nathan's, which expense has been reduced by the repayment of some of the Miami Subs' assumed debt since the date of the acquisition. Impairment charges on notes receivable of $151,000 during the fiscal 2001 period and $840,000 during the fiscal 2000 period relate to write-downs of one and six notes receivable, respectively. Impairment charges on fixed assets of $127,000 during the fiscal 2001 period and $465,000 during the fiscal 2000 period reflect write-downs relating to one under-performing store in the fiscal 2001 period and three under- performing stores in the fiscal 2000 period. 26
Other expense of $462,000 during the fiscal 2001 period relates primarily to lease termination expenses of units that were not part of the final divestiture plan of $463,000. During the fiscal 2000 period, other expense of $427,000 included approximately $191,000 in lease expense resulting from the default of subleases and $236,000 in connection with the satisfaction of certain financial guarantees. Income Tax Expense - ------------------ In the fiscal 2001 period, the income tax provision was $1,416,000 or 46.9% of income before income taxes as compared to an income tax benefit of ($250,000) or(16.4%) of loss before income taxes in the fiscal 2000 period. These rates are higher than the statutory federal tax rate due to the effect of state and local taxes and certain nondeductible expenses. Nathan's has agreed to accept an offer by the Internal Revenue Service to conclude the Miami Subs tax audit for the years 1991 through 1996. As part of that agreement, Nathan's expects that certain amortization of intangible assets previously deducted by Miami Subs will be reversed and will not be deductible in the future. Liquidity and Capital Resources Cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2002 aggregated $1,834,000, decreasing by $2,491,000 during the fiscal 2002 period. At March 31, 2002, marketable securities and investment in limited partnership increased by $4,171,000 from March 25, 2001 to $8,819,000 and net working capital increased to $9,565,000 from $5,210,000 at March 25, 2001. Cash used in operations of $3,081,000 in the fiscal 2002 period is primarily attributable to net income of $1,249,000, non-cash charges of $4,195,000, including depreciation and amortization of $2,549,000, impairment charges of $870,000, deferred taxes of $509,000 and provision for doubtful accounts of $267,000, in addition to a decrease in other assets of $104,000, which were more than offset by decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $2,538,000, an increase in marketable securities and investment in limited partnership of $4,171,000, an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $295,000, an increase in inventories of $69,000 and a decrease in deferred franchise fees of $324,000. Cash provided by investing activities of $2,078,000 is comprised primarily of proceeds from the sale of two company-owned restaurants and one non-restaurant property totaling $3,348,000. On May 1, 2001, pursuant to an order of condemnation, we sold a company-owned restaurant to the State of Florida for $1,475,000, net of estimated expenses of $25,000, and repaid the outstanding mortgage of approximately $793,000 plus accrued interest. We successfully appealed the value of the property that was condemned by the State of Florida and were awarded an additional $850,000 in November 2001. On June 22, 2001, we also sold our restaurant in the Paramus Park Mall to a franchisee for $400,000 in cash and concurrently entered into a sub-lease for the property. On January 17, 2002, we also sold a non-restaurant location for $575,000. Additionally, $2,082,000 was expended relating to capital improvements of the company-owned restaurants and other fixed asset additions and was partially offset by repayments on notes receivable of $812,000. Cash used in financing activities of $1,488,000 represents repayments of notes payable and obligations under capital leases in the amount of $1,353,000. The majority of the repayments arose from the repayment of an outstanding mortgage of approximately $793,000 plus accrued interest in connection with the condemnation of a company-owned restaurant by the State of Florida, as described above. On September 14, 2001, Nathan's was authorized to purchase up to 1 million shares of its common stock. Pursuant to our stock repurchase program, we repurchased 41,691 shares of common stock in open market transactions at a total cost of $135,000 as of March 31, 2002. On April 10, 2002, we repurchased 751,000 shares of common stock in a private transaction at a total cost of $2,741,500. In connection with our acquisition of Miami Subs, we determined that up to 18 underperforming restaurants would be closed pursuant to our divestiture plan. Through March 31, 2002, we have terminated leases on 15 of those properties. We 27
are continuing to market two of the remaining properties for sale and terminated the lease for the last unit upon the lease expiration in May 2002. As of March 31, 2002, we have accrued approximately $1,461,000 and made payments of approximately $1,273,000 for lease obligations and termination costs, as part of the acquisition, for units with total future minimum lease obligations of $7,680,000 with remaining lease terms of one year up to approximately 17 years. We may incur future cash payments, consisting primarily of future lease payments, including costs and expenses associated with terminating additional leases, that were not part of our divestiture plan. We expect that we will make additional investments in certain existing restaurants in the future and that we will fund those investments from our operating cash flow. We do not expect to incur significant capital expenditures to develop new company-owned restaurants during our fiscal year ending March 30, 2003. There are currently 34 properties that we either own or lease from third parties which we lease or sublease to franchisees and non-franchisees. We remain contingently liable for all costs associated with these properties. Additionally, we guaranteed financing on behalf of certain franchisees with two third party lenders. Our maximum obligation for loans funded by the lenders as of March 31, 2002 was approximately $1.7 million. Management believes that available cash, marketable investment securities, and internally generated funds should provide sufficient capital to finance our operations for at least the next twelve months. We maintain a $7,500,000 uncommitted bank line of credit and have not borrowed any funds to date under this line of credit. SEASONALITY Our business is affected by seasonal fluctuations, the effects of weather and economic conditions. Historically, sales and earnings have been highest during our first two fiscal quarters with the fourth fiscal quarter representing the slowest period. This seasonality is primarily attributable to weather conditions in our marketplace for our company-owned Nathan's stores, which is principally the New York metropolitan area. Miami Subs' restaurant sales have historically been strongest during the period March through August, which approximates our first and second quarters, as a result of a heavy concentration of restaurants being located in Florida. As a result, we believe that future revenues may become slightly more seasonal. IMPACT OF INFLATION During the past several years, our commodity costs have remained relatively stable. As such, we believe that inflation has not materially impacted earnings during that period of time. Last year we experienced increased costs of our meat products and utilities resulting from increased commodity costs. We also experienced increased costs for insurance attributable to the hardening of the insurance markets. This year, various Federal and New York State legislators have proposed changes to the existing minimum wage requirements. The New York State Assembly has voted to increase the minimum wage to $6.75 an hour beginning January 1, 2003 with automatic annual increases, commencing January 2004, based upon increases in the state's average weekly pay. Before being enacted, this proposal must be approved by the New York State Senate and signed by the Governor. In addition, U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy has proposed increasing the Federal minimum wage to $6.65 an hour which would be fully phased in by January 1, 2004. If this proposal is passed this year, the first increase of $0.60 an hour would take effect 60 days later, followed by a $0.50 cent an hour increase on January 1, 2003 and another $0.50 an hour increase on January 1, 2004. U.S. Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle has indicated that he wants to schedule a vote on this matter in the summer of 2002. We believe that these increases in the minimum wage could have a significant financial impact on our financial results. Prolonged increases in labor, food and other operating expenses could adversely affect our operations and those of the restaurant industry and we might have to reconsider our pricing strategy as a means to offset reduced operating margins. ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations ("SFAS No.141") and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ("SFAS 142"). SFAS No.141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method. Under SFAS No.142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) for impairment. Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). The amortization provisions of SFAS 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. There are also transition provisions that apply to business combinations completed before July 1, 2001, that were accounted for by the purchase method. With respect to its goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1, 2001, Nathan's is required to adopt SFAS 142 effective in its next fiscal year, commencing April 1, 2002. Nathan's will no longer amortize existing goodwill and certain intangibles having indefinite lives, thus reducing amortization expense by approximately $600,000 per year. We expect to complete our impairment analysis during the first quarter fiscal 2003 and expect to 28
recognize an impairment charge of approximately $12 to $13 million upon adoption of SFAS No. 142. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations"("SFAS No.143"). SFAS No.143 addresses financial and reporting obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. SFAS No.143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Nathan's is currently evaluating the effect of adoption on its financial position and results of operations. In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS No.144"). SFAS No.144 supersedes FAS 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of" and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions". SFAS No.144 retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS 121 for recognition and measurement of impairment, but amends the accounting and reporting standards for segments of a business to be disposed of. The provisions of this statement are required to be adopted no later than fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2001, with early adoption encouraged. Nathan's is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 144, which Nathan's does not expect to be material. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements contained in this report are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements represent our current judgment regarding future events. Although we would not make forward-looking statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we cannot guarantee their accuracy and actual results may differ materially from those we anticipated due to a number of uncertainties, many of which we are not aware. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are not within our control, include, but are not limited to: the ongoing effects of the events of September 11, 2001; economic, weather, legislative and business conditions; the collectibility of receivables; the availability of suitable restaurant sites on reasonable rental terms; changes in consumer tastes; the ability to continue to attract franchisees; the ability to purchase our primary food and paper products at reasonable prices; no material increases in the minimum wage; and our ability to attract competent restaurant and managerial personnel. We generally identify forward- looking statements with the words "believe", "intend," "plan," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "will," "should" and similar expressions. Item 7A. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk - ------- ---------------------------------------------------------- We have historically invested our cash and cash equivalents in short term, fixed rate, highly rated and highly liquid instruments which are reinvested when they mature throughout the year. Although our existing investments are not considered at risk with respect to changes in interest rates or markets for these instruments, our rate of return on short- term investments could be affected at the time or reinvestment as a result of intervening events. We have invested our marketable investment securities in intermediate term, fixed rate, highly rated and highly liquid instruments and a highly liquid investment limited partnership that invests principally in equities. These investments are subject to fluctuations in interest rates and the performance of the equity markets. The interest rate on our borrowings are generally determined based upon prime rate and may be subject to market fluctuation as the prime rate changes as determined within each specific agreement. We do not anticipate entering into interest rate swaps or other financial instruments to hedge our borrowings. The cost of commodities are subject to market fluctuation. We have not attempted to hedge against fluctuations in the prices of the commodities we purchase using future, forward, option or other instruments. As a result, our future commodities purchases are subject to changes in the prices of such commodities. 29
Foreign franchisees generally conduct business with us and make payments in, United States dollars, reducing the risks inherent with changes in the values of foreign currencies. As a result, we have not purchased future contracts, options or other instruments to hedge against changes in values of foreign currencies. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - ------ ------------------------------------------- The consolidated financial statements and supplementary data is submitted as a separate section of this report beginning on Page F-1. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and - ------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Financial Disclosure -------------------- On March 15, 2002, we dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP, our independent auditors for the fiscal year ended March 25, 2001 and, effective March 25, 2002, replaced them with Grant Thornton LLP, our auditors for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002. The decision to change accountants was ratified by our Audit Committee on March 19, 2002. The reports of Arthur Andersen LLP for the years ended March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 do not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, or a qualification or modification as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. In connection with the audit for our fiscal years ended March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 and for the period from March 26, 2001 through the date of change in auditors, there were no disagreements with Arthur Andersen LLP on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to their satisfaction, would have caused it to make a reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report. We have not had any discussions nor received any written reports or oral advice from Grant Thornton LLP during the two most recent fiscal years and any subsequent interim period with respect to either the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or as to the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements. 30
PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant - ------- -------------------------------------------------- The information required in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report. Item 11. Executive Compensation - ------- ---------------------- The information required in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management - ------- -------------------------------------------------------------- The information required in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions - ------- ---------------------------------------------- The information required in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report. 31
PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K - ------- --------------------------------------------------------------- (a)(1) Consolidated Financial Statements The consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index to consolidated financial statements and schedule on Page F-1 are filed as part of this report. (2) Financial Statement Schedule The consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index to consolidated financial statements and schedule on Page F-1 is filed as part of this report. (3) Exhibits Certain of the following exhibits (as indicated in the footnotes to the list), were previously filed as exhibits to other reports or registration statements filed by the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1993 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are herein incorporated by reference. Exhibit No. Exhibit - ------- ------- 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation.(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) 3.2 Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, filed December 15, 1992.(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) 3.3 By-Laws, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 1999.) 4.1 Specimen Stock Certificate.(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) 4.2 Form of Warrant issued to Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co., Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) 4.3 Form of Warrant issued to Howard M. Lorber. ( Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 27, 1994.) 4.4 Amendment to Warrant issued to Howard M. Lorber (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996.) 4.5 Specimen Rights Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Current Report on form 8-K dated July 14, 1995.) 10.1 Employment Agreement with Wayne Norbitz, dated December 28, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) 10.2 Leases for premises at Coney Island, New York, as follows: (Incorporated by reference Exhibit 10.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) a) Lease, dated November 22, 1967, between Nathan's Realty Associates and the Company. b) Lease, dated November 22, 1967, between Ida's Realty Associates and the Company. c) Lease, dated November 17, 1967, between Ida's Realty Associates and the Company. 10.3 Leases for the premises at Yonkers, New York, as follows: (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) a) Lease Modification of Land and Building Lease between the Yonkers Corp. and the Company, dated November 19, 1980; b) Lease Modification of Land and Building Lease between 787 Central Park Avenue, Inc., and the Company dated May 1, 1980. 10.4 Lease with NWCM Corp. for premises at Oceanside, New York, dated March 14, 1975. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) 10.5 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 33-93396.) 10.6 Area Development Agreement with Marriott Corporation, dated February 19, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(a) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 1993.) 32
10.7 Area Development Agreement with Premiere Foods, dated September 11, 1990. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) 10.8 Form of Standard Franchise Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) 10.9 401K Plan and Trust. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 33-56976.) 10.10 Amendment dated November 8, 1993, to the Employment Agreement, dated December 28, 1992, with Wayne Norbitz. ( Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 27, 1994.) 10.11 License Agreement dated as of February 28, 1994, among Nathan's Famous Systems, Inc. and SMG, Inc., including amendments and waivers thereto. ( Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 27, 1994.) 10.12 Outside Director Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 33-89442.) 10.13 Home Depot Food Service Lease Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 26, 1995.) 10.14 Modification Agreement to the Employment Agreement with Wayne Norbitz, dated December 28, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report filed on form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 1996.) 10.15 Amendment to License Agreement dated as of February 28, 1994, among Nathan's Famous Systems, Inc. and SMG, Inc. including waivers and amendments thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report filed on form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 1996.) 10.16 Warrant Agreement dated November 24, 1996 between the Company and Jerry Krevans. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 1997.) 10.17 Second Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of April 6, 1998 between Nathan's Famous, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Form 8-A/A dated April 6, 1998.) 10.18 1998 Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 1998.) 10.19 North Fork Bank Promissory Note.(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 1999.) 10.20 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Donald L. Perlyn effective September 30, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 26, 2000.) 10.21 Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of December 10, 1999 between Nathan's Famous, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Form 8- A/A dated December 10, 1999.) 10.22 Master Distributor Agreement with U.S. Foodservice, Inc..(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 26, 2000.) 10.23 Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2000 with Howard M. Lorber.(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report filed on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 26, 2000.) 10.24 Marketing Agreement with beverage supplier. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Quarterly Report filed on form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 25, 2000.) 21 List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant. 23.1 Consent of Grant Thornton LLP dated June 24, 2002. (b) Reports on Form 8-K On March 15, 2002 - Item 4 - the Company reported that it dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP the Companies independent public accountants for the fiscal year ended March 25, 2001. On March 26, 2002 - Item 4 - the Company reported that it hired Grant Thornton LLP as the Companies independent public accountants for the year ending March 31, 2002. 33
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on the 24th day of June, 2002. Nathan's Famous, Inc. /s/ WAYNE NORBITZ - ---------------------------- Wayne Norbitz, President and Chief Operating Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities indicated on the 24th day of June, 2002. /s/ HOWARD M. LORBER - ------------------------- Howard M. Lorber Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) /s/ WAYNE NORBITZ - ------------------------- Wayne Norbitz President, Chief Operating Officer and Director /s/ RONALD G. DEVOS - ------------------------- Ronald G. DeVos Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) /s/ DONALD L. PERLYN - ------------------------- Donald L. Perlyn Executive Vice President and Director /s/ ROBERT J. EIDE - ------------------------- Robert J. Eide Director /s/ BARRY LEISTNER - ------------------------- Barry Leistner Director /s/ BRIAN GENSON - ------------------------- Brian Genson Director /s/ ATTILIO F. PETROCELLI - ------------------------- Attilio F. Petrocelli Director
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ---- Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants: Grant Thornton LLP F-2 Report of Independent Public Accountants: Arthur Andersen LLP F-3 Consolidated Balance Sheets F-4 Consolidated Statements of Operations F-5 Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity F-6 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F-7 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-8 - F-41 Report of Independent Public Accountants on Schedule: Arthur Andersen LLP F-42 Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts F-43 Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants F-44 F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Board of Directors and Shareholders Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Nathan's Famous, Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of March 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the fifty-three weeks then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nathan's Famous, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the fifty-three weeks then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have also audited the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14(a)(2) as of and for the fifty-three weeks ended March 31, 2002. In our opinion, this schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be set forth therein. /s/GRANT THORNTON LLP Melville, New York May 24, 2002 (except for Note N-2, as to which the date is May 29, 2002) F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nathan's Famous, Inc., (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries as of March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years ended March 25, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nathan's Famous, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years ended March 25, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. /s/Arthur Andersen LLP Melville, New York June 14, 2001 This Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants is a copy of a previously issued Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") report and has not been reissued by Andersen. The inclusion of this previously issued Andersen report is pursuant to the "Temporary Final Rule and Final Rule: Requirements for Arthur Andersen LLP Auditing Clients," issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in March 2002. Note that this previously issued Andersen report includes references to certain fiscal years, which are not required to be presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002. F-3
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except share amounts) ASSETS March 31, 2002 March 25, 2001 -------------- -------------- CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,834 $ 4,325 Marketable securities and investment in limited partnership 8,819 4,648 Notes and accounts receivable, net 2,808 4,178 Inventories 592 523 Assets available for sale 1,512 1,510 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,269 974 Deferred income taxes 1,747 1,714 -------- -------- Total current assets 18,581 17,872 Notes receivable, net 2,277 1,729 Property and equipment, net 8,925 11,279 Assets available for sale - 450 Intangible assets, net 17,123 18,011 Deferred income taxes 1,539 2,081 Other assets, net 300 404 -------- -------- $48,745 $51,826 ======== ======== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES Current maturities of notes payable and capital lease obligations $ 559 $ 1,343 Accounts payable 1,619 1,978 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 6,506 8,685 Deferred franchise fees 332 656 -------- -------- Total current liabilities 9,016 12,662 Notes payable and capital lease obligations, less current maturities 1,220 1,789 Other liabilities 2,364 2,344 -------- -------- Total liabilities 12,600 16,795 -------- -------- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note N) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 7,065,202 and 7,065,202 shares issued; and 7,023,511 and 7,065,202 shares outstanding at March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001, respectively 71 71 Additional paid-in capital 40,746 40,746 Accumulated deficit (4,537) (5,786) -------- -------- 36,280 35,031 Treasury stock, 41,691 shares at cost (135) - -------- -------- Total stockholders' equity 36,145 35,031 -------- -------- $ 48,745 $ 51,826 ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. F-4Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) Fifty-three weeks ended Fifty-two weeks ended March 31, 2002 March 25, 2001 March 26, 2000 -------------- -------------- -------------- REVENUES Sales $32,349 $34,799 $29,642 Franchise fees and royalties 7,944 8,814 5,906 License royalties 2,038 1,958 1,906 Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliate - - (163) Investment and other income 2,068 1,603 600 ------- ------- ------- Total revenues 44,399 47,174 37,891 ------- ------- ------- COSTS AND EXPENSES Cost of sales 21,643 22,530 18,977 Restaurant operating expenses 7,788 8,964 8,208 Depreciation and amortization 1,661 1,791 1,358 Amortization of intangible assets 888 839 716 General and administrative expenses 9,292 8,978 8,222 Interest expense 256 310 198 Impairment charge on long-lived assets 685 127 465 Impairment charge on notes receivable 185 151 840 Other (income) expense, net (210) 462 427 ------- ------- ------- Total costs and expenses 42,188 44,152 39,411 ------- ------- ------- Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes 2,211 3,022 (1,520) Provision (benefit) for income taxes 962 1,416 (250) ------- ------- ------- Net income (loss) $ 1,249 $ 1,606 $(1,270) ======= ======= ======= PER SHARE INFORMATION Net income (loss) per share Basic $.18 $.23 $(.22) ==== ==== ===== Diluted $.18 $.23 $(.22) ==== ==== ===== Weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share Basic 7,048,000 7,059,000 5,881,000 ========= ========= ========= Diluted 7,083,000 7,098,000 5,881,000 ========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. F-5Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Fifty-three weeks ended March 31, 2002 and fifty-two weeks ended March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 (in thousands, except share amounts) Additional Total Common Common paid-in Accumulated Treasury stock, at cost stockholders' shares stock capital deficit Shares Amount equity ------------ ----------- ------------ -------------- -------- ------- ------------- Balance, March 29, 1999 4,722,216 $47 $32,423 $(6,122) - $ - $26,348 Common stock issued in connection with merger 2,317,980 23 7,367 - - - 7,390 Warrants issued in connection with merger - - 330 - - - 330 Options assumed in connection with merger - - 549 - - - 549 Net loss - - - (1,270) - - (1,270) --------- --- ------- ------- ----- ----- ------ Balance, March 26, 2000 7,040,196 70 40,669 (7,392) - - 33,347 Stock compensation 25,000 1 77 - - - 78 Warrants exercised 6 - - - - - - Net income - - - 1,606 - - 1,606 --------- --- ------- ------- ----- ----- ------ Balance, March 25, 2001 7,065,202 71 40,746 (5,786) - - 35,031 Repurchase of treasury stock - - - - 41,691 (135) (135) Net income - - - 1,249 - - 1,249 --------- --- ------- ------- ----- ------ ------ Balance, March 31, 2002 7,065,202 $71 $40,746 $(4,537) 41,691 $(135) $36,145 ========= === ======= ======= ====== ====== =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. F-6Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) Fifty-three weeks ended Fifty-two weeks ended March 31, 2002 March 25, 2001 March 26, 2000 -------------- -------------- -------------- Cash flows from operating activities Net income (loss) $ 1,249 $ 1,606 $(1,270) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities Depreciation and amortization 1,661 1,791 1,358 Amortization of intangible assets 888 839 716 (Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets (1,226) - 123 Stock compensation expense - 78 - Impairment of long-lived assets 685 127 465 Impairment of notes receivable 185 151 840 Provision for doubtful accounts 267 191 895 Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliate - - 163 Deferred income taxes 509 313 (958) Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisition of Miami Subs Marketable securities and investment in limited partnership (4,171) (1,651) 270 Notes and accounts receivable (26) (1,350) (504) Inventories (69) 20 3 Prepaid expenses and other current assets (295) (339) (187) Other assets 104 159 182 Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities (2,538) 961 (158) Deferred franchise fees (324) (76) 721 Other liabilities 20 1,329 (682) ------- ------- ------- Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (3,081) 4,149 1,977 ------- ------- ------- Cash flows from investing activities Cash acquired in connection with merger, net of transaction costs - - 3,429 Lease terminations and other costs in connection with acquisition - (1,036) - Purchases of property and equipment (2,082) (1,458) (1,975) Purchase of intellectual property - - (1,590) Payments received on notes receivable 812 506 320 Proceeds from sales of property and equipment 3,348 45 - ------- ------- ------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 2,078 (1,943) 184 ------- ------- ------- Cash flows from financing activities Principal repayments of borrowing (1,353) (278) (1,929) Repurchase of treasury stock (135) - - ------- ------- ------- Net cash used in financing activities (1,488) (278) (1,929) ------- ------- ------- Net change in cash and cash equivalents $(2,491) $ 1,928 $ 232 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 4,325 2,397 2,165 ------- ------- ------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 1,834 $ 4,325 $ 2,397 ======= ======= ======= Cash paid during the year for Interest $ 264 $ 317 $ 207 ======= ======= ======= Income taxes $ 149 $ 1,508 $ 831 ======= ======= ======= Noncash financing activities: Loan to franchisee in connection with sale of restaurant $ 416 $ 130 $ - ======= ======= ======= Common stock, warrants and options issued in connection with acquisition $ - $ - $ 8,269 ======= ======= =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. F-7Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE A - DESCRIPTION AND ORGANIZATION OF BUSINESS 1. Description of Business Nathan's Famous, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively the "Company" or "Nathan's") has historically operated, in one business segment, a chain of retail fast food restaurants featuring Nathan's famous brand of all beef frankfurters, fresh crinkle-cut french fried potatoes and a variety of other menu offerings. Since fiscal 1998, the Company has supplemented Nathan's franchise program with the Nathan's Branded Product Program, which enables foodservice retailers to sell some of Nathan's proprietary products outside of the realm of a traditional franchise relationship. During fiscal 2000, the Company acquired the intellectual property rights, including trademarks, recipes and franchise agreements of Roasters Corp. and Roasters Franchise Corp. ("Roasters"), the franchisor of Kenny Rogers Roasters. In addition, Nathan's completed a merger with Miami Subs Corporation ("Miami Subs") whereby it acquired the remaining 70% of Miami Subs common stock not already owned. Miami Subs features a wide variety of lunch, dinner and snack foods, including hot and cold sandwiches and various ethnic foods. Roasters features home-style family foods based on a menu centered around wood-fire rotisserie chicken. At March 31, 2002, the Company's restaurant system, consisting of Nathan's Famous, Kenny Rogers Roasters and Miami Subs restaurants, included 22 company-owned units concentrated in the New York metropolitan area, (including New Jersey and Florida), 364 franchised or licensed units, including 3 units operating pursuant to management agreements and approximately 1,500 branded product points of sale under the Nathan's Branded Product Program, located in 39 states, the District of Columbia, and 14 foreign countries. 2. Organization of Business In July 1987, all of the outstanding shares, options and warrants of Nathan's Famous, Inc. (the "Predecessor Company"), a then publicly held New York corporation, were acquired through a cash transaction, accounted for by the purchase method of accounting (the "Acquisition"). In connection with the Acquisition, a privately-held New York corporation (the "Acquiring Corporation") was merged into the Predecessor Company. The purchase price exceeded the fair value of the acquired assets of the Predecessor Company by $15,374, and such amount is recorded net of accumulated amortization in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. F-8
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE A (continued) In November 1989, the surviving corporation was merged with Nathan's Newco, Inc., a Delaware corporation which, upon the effectiveness of the merger, changed its name to Nathan's Famous, Inc. ("NFI"). In August 1992, Nathan's Famous Holding Corp. ("NFH"), a new Delaware corporation was formed. Pursuant to a merger agreement, NFI became a wholly owned subsidiary of NFH. On December 15, 1992, NFI and NFH amended their charter to change their respective names to Nathan's Famous Operating Corp. ("NFOC") and Nathan's Famous, Inc. NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 1. Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. 2. Fiscal Year The Company's fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in March, which results in a 52- or 53-week reporting period. The results of operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 is on the basis of a 53-week reporting period. The results of operations for the fiscal years ended March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 are on the basis of a 52-week reporting period. 3. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. F-9
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE B (continued) 4. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash restricted for untendered shares associated with the Acquisition amounted to $83 at March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001, respectively, and is included in cash and cash equivalents. At March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001, cash and cash equivalents included unexpended Miami Subs' advertising funds of $0 and $2,104, respectively. 5. Impairment of Notes Receivable In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114 ("SFAS No. 114") "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," Nathan's applies the provisions thereof to value notes receivable. Pursuant to SFAS No. 114, a loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. When evaluating a note for impairment, the factors considered include: 1) indications that the borrower is experiencing business problems such as operating losses, marginal working capital, inadequate cash flow or business interruptions, 2) loans secured by collateral that is not readily marketable, or 3) that are susceptible to deterioration in realizable value. When determining impairment, management's assessment includes its intention to extend certain leases beyond the minimum lease term and the note holder's ability to meet its obligation over that extended term. In certain cases where Nathan's has determined that a loan has been impaired, it does not expect to extend or renew the underlying leases. Based on the Company's analysis, it has determined that there are notes that have incurred such an impairment (Note E). Following is a summary of the impaired notes receivable: March 31, March 25, 2002 2001 --------- --------- Total recorded investment in impaired notes receivable $1,000 $1,105 Allowance for impaired notes receivable (640) (613) ------ ------ Recorded investment in impaired notes receivable, net $ 360 $ 492 ====== ====== F-10
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE B (continued) Based on the present value of the estimated cash flows of identified impaired note receivables, the Company has recognized approximately $47 and $63 of interest income on these notes for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001, respectively. 6. Inventories Inventories, which are stated at the lower of cost or market value, consist primarily of restaurant food items, supplies, marketing items and equipment in connection with the Branded Product Program. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. 7. Marketable Securities and Investment in Limited Partnership In accordance with SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," the Company determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase and reassesses the appropriateness of the classification at each reporting date. At March 31, 2002, all marketable securities and investment in limited partnership held by the Company have been classified as trading and, as a result, are stated at fair value. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities, as determined on a specific identification basis, as well as unrealized holding gains and losses on trading securities are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Investment income in the trading limited partnership is based upon Nathan's proportionate share of the change in the underlying net assets of the partnership. The partnership invests primarily in publicly traded common stocks with a concentration in securities traded on exchanges in the United States of America. 8. Sales of Restaurants The Company observes the provisions of SFAS No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate," which establishes accounting standards for recognizing profit or loss on sales of real estate. SFAS No. 66 provides for profit recognition by the full accrual method, provided (a) the profit is determinable, that is, the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collectible can be estimated, and (b) the earnings process is virtually complete, that is, the seller is not obliged to perform significant activities after the sale to earn the profit. Unless both conditions exist, recognition of all or part of the profit shall be postponed and other methods of profit recognition shall be followed. In accordance with SFAS No. 66, the Company recognizes profit on F-11
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE B (continued) sales of restaurants under both the installment method and the deposit method, depending on the specific terms of each sale. The Company continues to record depreciation expense on the property subject to the sales contracts that are accounted for under the deposit method and records any principal payments received as a deposit until such time that the transaction meets the sales criteria of SFAS No. 66. As of March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001, the Company had deposits of $214 and $332 included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, the Company sold two company-owned restaurants and a nonrestaurant property for total proceeds of $3,348. The Company recognized a gain of $1,226 in connection with these sales. 9. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated primarily on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the lease term of the related asset. The estimated useful lives are as follows: Building and improvements 5 - 25 years Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures 5 - 15 years Leasehold improvements 5 - 20 years 10. Intangible Assets Intangible assets consist of (i) the goodwill resulting from the Acquisition; (ii) trademarks and trade names, franchise rights and recipes in connection with Roasters and (iii) goodwill and certain identifiable intangibles resulting from the Miami Subs acquisition (Note C). These intangible assets are being amortized over periods from 10 to 40 years. F-12
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE B (continued) 11. Long-lived Assets Long-lived assets and intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment is measured by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from use of the assets and their ultimate disposition. In instances where impairment is determined to exist, the Company writes down the asset to its fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis whenever impairment factors are determined to be present. The Company considers a history of restaurant operating losses to be its primary indicator of potential impairment for individual restaurant locations. The Company has identified two, one and three units that have been impaired, and recorded impairment charges of $685, $127 and $465 in the statements of operations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, respectively. The Company periodically reviews intangible assets for impairment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of those assets may not be recoverable. No impairment charges have been recorded with respect to such intangible assets for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000. (See Note B-22.) 12. Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate The Company accounted for its initial investment in Miami Subs under the equity method of accounting until the completion of the merger. Accordingly, the carrying value of the investment, prior to the acquisition, was equal to the Company's initial cash investment in Miami Subs, plus its share of the loss of Miami Subs through September 30, 1999. 13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and investment in limited partnership, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of the instruments. The carrying amounts of note payable and capital lease obligations and notes receivable approximate their fair values. F-13
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE B (continued) 14. Stock-Based Compensation The Company complies with the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." This statement establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based employee compensation plans. The provisions of SFAS No. 123 encourage entities to adopt a fair value-based method of accounting for stock compensation plans; however, these provisions also permit the Company to continue to measure compensation costs under pre-existing accounting pronouncements. Pursuant to SFAS No. 123, the Company has elected to continue the accounting set forth in Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and to provide the necessary pro forma disclosures. 15. Start-up Costs Preopening and similar costs are expensed as incurred. 16. Revenue Recognition - Company-owned Restaurants Sales by Company-owned restaurants are recognized on a cash basis, upon the performance of services. 17. Revenue Recognition - Franchising Operations In connection with its franchising operations, the Company receives initial franchise fees, development fees, royalties, contributions to marketing funds, and in certain cases, revenue from sub-leasing restaurant properties to franchisees. Initial franchise fees are recognized as income when substantially all services and conditions relating to the sale of the franchise have been performed or satisfied, which generally occurs when the franchised restaurant commences operations. Development fees are nonrefundable and the related agreements require the franchisee to open a specified number of restaurants in the development area within a specified time period or the agreements may be canceled by the Company. Revenue from development agreements is deferred and recognized as restaurants in the development area commence operations on a pro rata basis to the minimum number of restaurants required to be open, or at the time the development agreement is effectively canceled. Royalties, which are based upon a percentage of the franchisee's gross sales, are recognized as income when the fees are earned and become receivable and deemed collectible. Revenue from sub-leasing properties to franchisees is recognized as income as the F-14
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE B (continued) revenue is earned and becomes receivable and deemed collectible. Sub-lease rental income is presented net of associated lease costs in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Franchise and area development fees received prior to completion of the revenue recognition process are recorded as deferred revenue. At March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001, $332 and $656, respectively, of deferred franchise fees are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. 18. Concentrations of Credit Risk The Company's accounts receivable consist principally of receivables from franchisees for royalties and advertising contributions and from sales under the Branded Product Program. At March 31, 2002, one franchisee represented 13% of franchise royalties receivable and at March 25, 2001, one franchisee represented 10% of franchise royalties receivable (Note E). 19. Advertising The Company administers various advertising funds on behalf of its subsidiaries and franchisees to coordinate the marketing efforts of the Company. Under these arrangements, the Company collects and disburses fees paid by franchisees and Company-owned stores for national and regional advertising, promotional and public relations programs. Contributions are based on specified percentages of net sales, generally ranging up to 3%. Advertising contributions from Company-owned stores are included in restaurant operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Net Company-owned store advertising expense was $940, $1,602 and $888, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, respectively. 20. Income Taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. 21. Reclassifications Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation. F-15
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE B (continued) 22. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS No. 141") and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS No. 142"). SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) for impairment. Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). The amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. With respect to goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1, 2001, Nathan's is required to adopt SFAS No. 142 effective in its next fiscal year, commencing April 1, 2002. The Company will no longer amortize existing goodwill and certain intangible assets having indefinite lives, thereby reducing amortization expense by approximately $600 per year. The Company expects to complete its impairment analysis during the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and expects to recognize an impairment charge of approximately $12.0 to $13.0 million upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" ("SFAS No. 143"). SFAS No. 143 addresses financial and reporting obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. SFAS No. 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Nathan's is currently evaluating the effect of adoption on its financial position and results of operations. In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS No. 144"). SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of" and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions." This statement retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. F-16
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE B (continued) 121 for recognition and measurement of impairment, but amends the accounting and reporting standards for segments of a business to be disposed of. The provisions of SFAS No. 144 are required to be adopted no later than fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2001, with early adoption encouraged. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 144, which the Company expects will not be material. NOTE C - ACQUISITIONS On February 19, 1999, the U. S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, Durham Division, confirmed the Joint Plan of Reorganization of the Official Committee of Franchisees of Roasters Corp. and Roasters Franchise Corp., operators of Kenny Rogers Roasters Restaurants. Under the Joint Plan of Reorganization, on April 1, 1999, Nathan's acquired the intellectual property rights, including trademarks, recipes and franchise agreements, of Roasters Corp. and Roasters Franchise Corp. for $1,250 in cash plus related expenses of approximately $340. NF Roasters Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was created for the purpose of acquiring these assets. The acquired assets are recorded as intangibles in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of 10 to 20 years. No company-owned restaurants were acquired in this transaction. Results of operations are included in these consolidated financial statements as of April 1, 1999. On November 25, 1998, the Company acquired 8,121,000 (2,030,250 after giving effect to a 4-for-1 reverse stock split) shares, or approximately 30% of the then outstanding common stock, of Miami Subs Corporation for $4,200, excluding transaction costs. On January 15, 1999, the Company and Miami Subs entered into a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which Nathan's would acquire the remaining outstanding shares of Miami Subs in exchange for shares of and warrants to purchase Nathan's common stock. On September 30, 1999, Nathan's completed the acquisition of Miami Subs and acquired the remaining outstanding common stock of Miami Subs in exchange for 2,317,980 shares of Nathan's common stock, 579,040 warrants to purchase Nathan's common stock, and the assumption of existing employee options and warrants to purchase 542,284 shares of Miami Subs' common stock in connection with the merger. The total purchase price was approximately $13,000, including acquisition costs. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase under APB Opinion No. 16, "Accounting for Business Combinations" ("APB No. 16"). In accordance with APB No. 16, the Company allocated the purchase price of Miami Subs based on the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill of $1,668 resulted from the acquisition of Miami Subs and is being amortized over a period of 20 years. F-17
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE C (continued) In connection with the acquisition of Miami Subs, Nathan's planned to permanently close 18 under-performing company-owned restaurants. Nathan's expected to abandon or sell the related assets at amounts below the historical carrying amounts recorded by Miami Subs. In accordance with APB No. 16, the write-down of these assets was reflected as part of the purchase price allocation. To date the Company has closed or sold 15 units. The Company continues to market two of these properties for sale and will cease operations of the remaining unit upon lease expiration. The estimated disposal value is included in assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for the remaining units to be sold. As of March 31, 2002, as part of the acquisition, the Company has recorded approximately $1,461 ($877 after tax) for lease reserves and termination costs. The allocation of purchase price is as follows: Current assets $ 5,481 Property and equipment 7,060 Assets held for sale 653 Intangibles 5,441 Goodwill 1,668 Notes receivable - long-term 3,860 Other assets 2,212 Liabilities assumed (13,364) -------- $ 13,011 ======== The consolidated results of operations for Miami Subs are included in the consolidated financial statements as of the date of acquisition. Summarized below are the unaudited pro forma results of operations for the fifty-two weeks ended March 26, 2000 of Nathan's as though the Miami Subs acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented. Adjustments have been made for amortization of goodwill based upon salary expense based on employment agreements, reversal of Miami Subs merger costs, elimination of Nathan's 30% equity earnings in Miami Subs, issuance of common stock, and reduction of interest income on marketable securities used to purchase the initial 30% of Miami Subs' common stock. F-18
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE C (continued) Fifty-two weeks ended March 26, 2000 --------------------- Total revenues $ 50,455 ======== Net loss $ (1,466) ======== Net loss per share Basic $ (.21) ======== Diluted $ (.21) ======== Weighted average shares used in computing net loss per share Basic 7,040,000 ========= Diluted 7,040,000 ========= These pro forma results of operations have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of actual results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisition been made at the beginning of the period presented or of the results which may occur in the future. NOTE D - NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and excludes any dilutive effects of stock options or warrants. Diluted earnings per common share gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the period. Dilutive common shares used in the computation of diluted earnings per common share result from the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants, using the treasury stock method. F-19
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE D (continued) The following chart provides a reconciliation of information used in calculating the per share amounts for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, respectively: Net income (loss) Shares Net income (loss) per share -------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 (1) 2002 2001 2000 (1) 2002 2001 2000 (1) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Basic EPS Basic calculation $1,249 $1,606 $(1,270) 7,048,000 7,059,000 5,881,000 $.18 $.23 $(.22) Effect of dilutive employee stock options and warrants - - - 35,000 39,000 - - - - ------- ------ ------- --------- --------- --------- ---- ---- ----- Diluted EPS Diluted calculation $1,249 $1,606 $(1,270) 7,083,000 7,098,000 5,881,000 $.18 $.23 $(.22) ======= ====== ======= ========= ========= ========= ==== ==== =====
(1) Common stock equivalents have been excluded from the computation for net income (loss) per share for the fiscal year end March 26, 2000 as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. NOTE E - NOTES AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET Notes and accounts receivable, net, consists of the following: March 31, March 25, 2002 2001 --------- --------- Notes receivable, net of impairment charges $2,662 $2,874 Franchise and license royalties 1,376 2,499 Branded product sales 785 730 Other 906 684 ------ ------ 5,729 6,787 Less: allowance for doubtful accounts 644 880 Notes receivable due after one year 2,277 1,729 ------ ------ Notes and accounts receivable, net $2,808 $4,178 ====== ====== F-20Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE E (continued) Notes receivable at March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001 principally resulted from sales of restaurant businesses to Miami Subs' franchisees and are generally guaranteed by the purchaser and collateralized by the restaurant businesses and assets sold. The notes are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest with a balloon payment at the end of the term, with interest rates ranging principally between 5% and 10%. NOTE F - MARKETABLE SECURITIES AND INVESTMENT IN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Marketable securities at March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001 consisted of trading securities with aggregate fair values of $8,819 and $4,648, respectively. Fair values of corporate and municipal bonds are based upon quoted market prices. Investment income in trading limited partnerships is based on the Company's proportionate share of the change in the underlying net assets of the partnership. The gross unrealized holding gains and fair values of trading securities by major security type for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 were as follows: 2002 2001 2000 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ------------------------ Gross Gross Gross unrealized Fair unrealized Fair unrealized Fair holding value of holding value of holding value of gain (loss) investments gain (loss) investments gain (loss) investments ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Municipal bonds $(20) $7,801 $ 16 $3,628 $ 3 $1,540 Investment in trading limited partnerships * (2) 1,018 (438) 1,020 420 1,457 ---- ------ ----- ------ ---- ------ $(22) $8,819 $(422) $4,648 $423 $2,997 ==== ====== ===== ====== ==== ======
* Subject to the terms of the partnership, the Company has the right to liquidate its investment in the trading limited partnerships without penalty. F-21Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE G - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET Property and equipment consist of the following: March 31, March 25, 2002 2001 ---------- ----------- Construction-in-progress $ 842 $ 141 Land 1,665 1,983 Building and improvements 2,245 3,083 Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures 6,602 7,202 Leasehold improvements 7,201 7,949 -------- ------- 18,555 20,358 Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 9,630 9,079 -------- ------- $ 8,925 $ 11,279 Depreciation expense on property and equipment was $1,661, $1,791 and $1,358 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, respectively. In May 2001, the Company completed the sale of a restaurant property for approximately $1.5 million pursuant to an order of condemnation by the State of Florida. The fair value of the assets (which approximated the carrying value) is included in the current portion of assets available for sale at March 25, 2001 in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Concurrent with the sale, the Company satisfied the related note payable of approximately $793 plus accrued interest, and accordingly, had classified the remaining balance at March 25, 2001 as current in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company appealed the value of this property and on November 19, 2001, an Order was entered by the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida in and for Miami-Dade County pursuant to which the State of Florida Department of Transportation was ordered to pay to the Company, an aggregate value of $2,350, plus legal fees in the amount of $253 in connection with the condemnation by the State of Florida of the restaurant. The additional proceeds received by the Company of approximately $850 is recorded in "investment and other income" in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. F-22
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE H - INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET Intangible assets consist of the following: March 31, March 25, 2002 2001 --------- -------- Goodwill $17,043 $17,043 Trademark, trade name, franchise rights and recipes 7,031 7,031 ------- ------- 24,074 24,074 Less accumulated amortization 6,951 6,063 ------- ------- Intangible assets, net $17,123 $18,011 ======= ======= Amortization expense related to these intangible assets was $888, $839 and $716 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, respectively. NOTE I - ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following: March 31, March 25, 2002 2001 ------- ------- Payroll and other benefits $1,455 $1,365 Professional and legal costs 407 898 Self-insured retention 1,346 825 Rent, occupancy and sublease termination costs 831 1,236 Taxes payable 595 512 Unexpended advertising funds - 2,104 Other 1,872 1,745 ------ ------ $6,506 $8,685 ====== ====== F-23
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE J - NOTES PAYABLE AND CAPITALIZED LEASE OBLIGATIONS A summary of notes payable and capitalized lease obligations is as follows: March 31, March 25, 2002 2001 --------- --------- Note payable to bank at 8.5% through January 2003 and adjusting to prime plus 0.25% in 2003, 2006, and 2009 and maturity in 2010 $1,333 $ 1,505 Note payable to bank at 8.0% through January 2002 - 806 Note payable to bank at 1.5% over prime and maturing in 2001 - 354 Note payable to bank at 8.75% and maturing in 2003 381 397 Capital lease obligations and other 65 70 ------ ------- 1,779 3,132 Less current portion (559) (1,343) ------ ------- Long-term portion $1,220 $ 1,789 ====== ======= The above notes are secured by the related property and equipment. In August 2001, Miami Subs entered into an agreement with a franchisee and a bank, which called for the assumption of a note payable by the franchisee and the repayment of an existing note receivable from the franchisee. The Company guarantees the franchisee's note payable with the bank. The Company's maximum obligation for loans funded by the lender, as of March 31, 2002, was approximately $333. At March 31, 2002, the aggregate annual maturities of notes payable and capitalized lease obligations are as follows: 2003 $ 559 2004 173 2005 173 2006 174 2007 174 Thereafter 526 ------ $1,779 ====== F-24
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE J (continued) The Company maintains a $7,500 line of credit with its primary banking institution. Borrowings under the line of credit are intended to be used to meet the normal short-term working capital needs of the Company. The line of credit is not a commitment and, therefore, credit availability is subject to ongoing approval. The line of credit expires on October 1, 2002, and bears interest at the prime rate (4.75% at March 31, 2002). There were no borrowings outstanding under this line of credit as of March 31, 2002. NOTE K - OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET Included in other (income) expense, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations is (i) the reversal of a previous litigation accrual of ($210) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 (ii) $463 in lease termination costs for the fiscal year ended March 25, 2001, and (iii) $236 in connection with the satisfaction of certain financial guarantees and $191 in lease expense resulting from the default of subleases for the fiscal year ended March 26, 2000. NOTE L - INCOME TAXES Income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000: 2002 2001 2000 ---- ---- ---- Federal Current $911 $ 868 $ 461 Deferred (93) 246 (719) ---- ------ ----- 818 1,114 (258) ---- ------ ----- State and local Current 160 235 247 Deferred (16) 67 (239) ---- ------ ----- 144 302 8 ---- ------ ----- $962 $1,416 $(250) ==== ====== ===== F-25
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE L (continued) Total income tax provision (benefit) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 differed from the amounts computed by applying the United States Federal income tax rate of 34% to income before income taxes as a result of the following: 2002 2001 2000 ---- ------ ----- Computed "expected" tax (benefit) expense $752 $1,027 $(516) Nondeductible amortization 169 222 212 State and local income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefit 106 199 8 Tax-exempt investment earnings (68) (30) (30) Nondeductible meals and entertainment and other 3 (2) 76 ---- ------ ----- $962 $1,416 $(250) ==== ====== ===== F-26
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE L (continued) The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below: March 31, March 25, 2002 2001 ------- -------- Deferred tax assets Accrued expenses $1,164 $ 602 Allowance for doubtful accounts 291 352 Impairment of notes receivable 256 245 Deferred revenue 978 1,243 Depreciation expense and impairment of long-lived assets 1,101 2,134 Expenses not deductible until paid 130 372 Amortization of intangibles 105 70 Net operating loss and other carryforwards 676 2,326 Other 59 106 ------ ------- Total gross deferred tax assets 4,760 7,450 ------ ------- Deferred tax liabilities Amortization of intangibles 422 - Unrealized gain on marketable securities and income on investment in limited partnership 207 209 Other 320 720 ------ ------- Total gross deferred tax liabilities 949 929 ------ ------- Net deferred tax asset 3,811 6,521 Less valuation allowance (525) (2,726) ------ ------- $3,286 $ 3,795 ====== ======= The determination that the net deferred tax asset of $3,286 and $3,795 at March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001, respectively, is realizable is based on anticipated future taxable income. F-27
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE L (continued) At March 31, 2002, as result of settling the Miami Subs IRS audits for the years 1991 through 1996, the Company had a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $1,289 remaining (after certain IRS agreed-upon adjustments and other reductions due to expiring losses) which is available to offset future taxable income through 2005 and general business credit carryforwards remaining of approximately $87 which may be used to offset liabilities through 2008. These losses and credits are subject to limitations imposed under the Internal Revenue Code pursuant to Section 382 regarding changes in ownership. As a result of these limitations, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the Miami Subs loss carryforwards and credits related to the acquisition. (See Note N-3). NOTE M - STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY, STOCK PLANS AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS 1. Stock Option Plans On December 15, 1992, the Company adopted the 1992 Stock Option Plan (the "1992 Plan") which provides for the issuance of incentive stock options ("ISO's") to officers and key employees and nonqualified stock options to directors, officers and key employees. Up to 525,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1992 Plan. The terms of the options are generally ten years, except for ISO's granted to any employee, whom prior to the granting of the option, owns stock representing more than 10% of the voting rights, for which the option term will be five years. The exercise price for nonqualified stock options outstanding under the 1992 Plan can be no less than the fair market value, as defined, of the Company's common stock at the date of grant. For ISO's, the exercise price can generally be no less than the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant, with the exception of any employee who prior to the granting of the option, owns stock representing more than 10% of the voting rights, for which the exercise price can be no less than 110% of fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant. On May 24, 1994, the Company adopted the Outside Director Stock Option Plan (the "Directors' Plan") which provides for the issuance of nonqualified stock options to nonemployee directors, as defined, of the Company. Under the Directors' Plan, 200,000 shares of common stock have been authorized and issued pursuant to the Directors' Plan. Options awarded to each nonemployee F-28
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE M (continued) director are fully vested, subject to forfeiture under certain conditions and shall be exercisable upon vesting. In April 1998, the Company adopted the Nathan's Famous Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "1998 Plan"), which provides for the issuance of nonqualified stock options to directors, officers and key employees. Up to 500,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1998 Plan. In June 2001, the Company adopted the Nathan's Famous Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan (the "2001 Plan"), which provides for the issuance of nonqualified stock options to directors, officers and key employees. Up to 350,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1998 Plan. The 1992 Plan, the 1998 Plan, the 2001 Plan and the Directors' Plan expire on December 2, 2002, April 5, 2008, June 13, 2011 and December 31, 2004, respectively, unless terminated earlier by the Board of Directors under conditions specified in the Plan. The Company issued 478,584 stock options to employees of Miami Subs Corporation to replace 957,168 of previously issued Miami Subs options pursuant to the merger agreement and issued 47,006 new options. All options were fully vested upon consummation of the merger. Exercise prices range from a low of $3.1875 to a high of $22.2517 per share and expire at various times through September 30, 2009. 2. Warrants In November 1996, the Company granted to a nonemployee consultant a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $3.94 per share, which represented the market price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Upon the date of grant, one-third of the shares vested immediately, one-third vested on the first anniversary thereof, and the remaining one-third vested on the second anniversary thereof. The warrant expired, unexercised, on November 24, 2001. F-29
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE M (continued) In connection with the merger with Miami Subs, the Company issued 579,040 warrants to purchase common stock to the former shareholders of Miami Subs. These warrants expire on September 30, 2004 and have an exercise price of $6.00 per share. The Company also issued 63,700 warrants to purchase common stock to the former warrant holders of Miami Subs. Exercise prices range between $16.55 per share and $49.63 per share expiring through March 2006. A summary of the status of the Company's stock option plans and warrants, excluding warrants issued to former shareholders of Miami Subs, at March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 and changes during the fiscal years then ended is presented in the tables and narrative below: 2002 2001 2000 ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- Weighted- Weighted- Weighted- average average average exercise exercise exercise Shares price Shares price Shares price --------- -------- --------- ------- ------ -------- Options outstanding - beginning of year 1,514,209 $3.86 1,614,924 $ 4.79 707,667 $5.08 Granted 307,000 3.20 - - 512,006 3.34 Replacement options - Miami Subs - - - - 478,584 6.04 Canceled (63) 6.20 (100,715) 10.60 (83,333) 5.50 --------- --------- ------- Options outstanding - end of year 1,821,146 4.29 1,514,209 3.86 1,614,924 4.79 ========= ========= ========= Options exercisable - end of year 1,367,479 1,220,876 1,086,424 Weighted-average fair value of options ========= ========= ========= granted $1.30 $ - $2.10 ===== ========= ===== Warrants outstanding - beginning of year 368,750 $4.53 401,200 $ 5.66 350,000 $3.88 Replacement warrants - Miami Subs - - - - 63,700 24.09 Expired (50,000) 3.94 (32,450) 18.61 (12,500) 49.63 --------- --------- ------- Warrants outstanding - end of year 318,750 4.62 368,750 4.53 401,200 5.66 --------- --------- ------- Warrants exercisable - end of year 318,750 368,750 401,200 Weighted-average fair value of warrants ========= ========= ======= granted $ - $ - $ - ====== ======= ====== At March 31, 2002, 153,666 common shares were reserved for future stock option grants. F-30
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE M (continued) The following table summarizes information about stock options and warrants (excluding warrants issued to the Miami Subs shareholders as part of the merger consideration) at March 31, 2002: Options and Options and warrants outstanding warrants exercisable ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- Weighted- Weighted- Weighted- Number average average Number average Range of outstanding remaining exercise exercisable exercise exercise prices at 3/31/02 contractual life price at 3/31/02 price --------------- ----------- --------------------------------- ----------- -------- $ 3.19 to $ 4.00 1,459,558 6.7 $ 3.35 1,005,891 $ 3.39 4.01 to 7.00 580,588 2.5 5.41 580,588 5.41 7.01 to 22.25 99,750 1.8 12.61 99,750 12.61 --------- --- ------- --------- ------- $ 3.19 to $ 22.25 2,139,896 5.3 $ 4.34 1,686,229 $ 4.63 ========= === ======= ========= ======= The fair value of each option and warrant grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: 2002 2000 ---- ---- Expected life (years) 6.6 6.3 Interest rate 4.06% 6.22% Volatility 32.3% 59.3% Dividend yield 0% 0% There were no options or warrants granted during fiscal 2001. F-31
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE M (continued) The Company has adopted the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized in the accompanying financial statements for the stock option plans. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock option plans been determined under SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income (loss) and income (loss) per share would approximate the pro forma amounts below: 2002 2001 2000 ------ ------ ------ Net income (loss): As reported $1,249 $1,606 $(1,270) Pro forma 839 1,248 (1,907) Net income (loss) per share: Basic ----- As reported $.18 $.23 $(.22) Pro forma .12 .18 (.32) Diluted ------- As reported $.18 $.23 $(.22) Pro forma .12 .18 (.32) Because the SFAS No. 123 method of accounting is not applied to options granted prior to January 1, 1995, the resulting pro forma compensation cost may not be representative of that to be expected in future years. 3. Common Stock Purchase Rights On June 20, 1995, the Board of Directors declared a dividend distribution of one common stock purchase right (the "Rights") for each outstanding share of Common Stock of the Company. The distribution was paid on June 20, 1995 to the shareholders of record on June 20, 1995. The terms of the Rights were amended on April 6, 1998 and December 8, 1999. Each Right, as amended, entitles the registered holder thereof to purchase from the Company one share of the Common Stock at a price of $4.00 per share (the "Purchase Price"), subject to adjustment for anti-dilution. New Common Stock certificates issued after June 20, 1995 upon transfer or new issuance of the Common Stock will contain a notation incorporating the Rights Agreement by reference. F-32
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE M (continued) The Rights are not exercisable until the Distribution Date. The Distribution Date is the earlier to occur of (i) ten days following a public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons (an "Acquiring Person") acquired, or obtained the right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock, as amended, or (ii) ten business days (or such later date as may be determined by action of the Board of Directors prior to such time as any person becomes an Acquiring Person) following the commencement, or announcement of an intention to make a tender offer or exchange offer by a person (other than the Company, any wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company or certain employee benefit plans) which, if consummated, would result in such person becoming an Acquiring Person. The Rights will expire on June 19, 2005, unless earlier redeemed by the Company. At any time prior to the time at which a person or group or affiliated or associated persons has acquired beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock of the Company, the Board of Directors of the Company may redeem the Rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $.001 per Right. In addition, the Rights Agreement, as amended, permits the Board of Directors, following the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Common Stock (but before an acquisition of 50% or more of Common Stock), to exchange the Rights (other than Rights owned by such 15% person or group), in whole or in part, for Common Stock, at an exchange ratio of one share of Common Stock per Right. Until a Right is exercised, the holder thereof, as such, will have no rights as a shareholder of the Company, including, without limitation, the right to vote or to receive dividends. The Company has reserved 9,358,764 shares of Common Stock for issuance upon exercise of the Rights. 4. Stock Repurchase Plan On September 14, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Purchases of stock will be made from time to time, depending on market conditions, in open market or in privately negotiated transactions, at prices deemed appropriate by management. There is no set time limit on the purchases. The Company expects to fund these stock repurchases from its operating cash flow. Through March 31, 2002, 41,691 shares have been repurchased at a cost of approximately $135. On April 10, 2002, the Company repurchased 751,000 shares of the Company's common stock for aggregate consideration of $2,741 in a private transaction with a stockholder. F-33
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE M (continued) 5. Employment Agreements The Company and its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer entered into a new employment agreement effective as of January 1, 2000. The new employment agreement expires December 31, 2004. Pursuant to the agreement, the officer receives a base salary of $1.00 and an annual bonus equal to 5% of the Company's consolidated pretax earnings for each fiscal year, with a minimum bonus of $250. The new employment agreement further provides for a three-year consulting period after termination of employment during which the officer will receive consulting payments in an annual amount equal to two thirds of the average of the annual bonuses awarded to him during the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year of termination of his employment. The employment agreement also provides for the continuation of certain benefits following death or disability. In connection with the agreement, the Company issued to the officer 25,000 shares of common stock with a fair market value at the date of grant of approximately $78. In the event that the officer's employment is terminated without cause, he is entitled to receive his salary and incentive payment, if any, for the remainder of the contract term. The employment agreement further provides that in the event there is a change in control of the Company, as defined therein, the officer has the option, exercisable within one year after such an event, to terminate his employment agreement. Upon such termination, he has the right to receive a lump sum payment equal to the greater of (i) his salary and annual bonuses for the remainder of the employment term (including a pro rated bonus for any partial fiscal year), which bonus shall be equal to the average of the annual bonuses awarded to him during the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year of termination; or (ii) 2.99 times his salary and annual bonus for the fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year termination, as well as a lump sum cash payment equal to the difference between the exercise price of any exercisable options having an exercise price of less than the current market price of the Company's common stock and such then current market price. In addition, the Company will provide the officer with a tax gross-up payment to cover any excise tax due. The Company and its President and Chief Operating Officer entered into an employment agreement on December 28, 1992 for a period commencing on January 1, 1993 and ending on December 31, 1996. The employment agreement has been extended annually through December 31, 2001, based on the original terms, and no nonrenewal notice has been given as of May 24, 2002. The agreement provides for annual compensation of $275 plus certain other F-34
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE M (continued) benefits. In November 1993, the Company amended this agreement to include a provision under which the officer has the right to terminate the agreement and receive payment equal to approximately three times annual compensation upon a change in control, as defined. The Company and the President of Miami Subs, pursuant to the merger agreement, entered into an employment agreement on September 30, 1999 for a period commencing on September 30, 1999 and ending on September 30, 2002. The agreement provides for annual compensation of $200 plus certain other benefits and automatically renews annually unless 180 days prior written notice is given to the employee. The agreement includes a provision under which the officer has the right to terminate the agreement and receive payment equal to approximately three times annual compensation upon a change in control, as defined. The Company and one executive of Miami Subs entered into a change of control agreement effective November 1, 2001 for annual compensation of $130 per year. The agreement additionally includes a provision under which the executive has the right to terminate the agreement and receive payment equal to approximately three times annual compensation upon a change in control, as defined. The Company and one executive of Miami Subs entered into an employee agreement effective as of July 1, 2001 for a period commencing on the date of the agreement and ending on July 1, 2003 and for compensation of $125 per year. The Company and another executive of Miami Subs entered into an employment agreement effective August 1, 2001 for a period commencing on the date of the agreement and ending on September 30, 2003 and for compensation at $90 per year. Each agreement also provides for certain other benefits. Each agreement additionally includes a provision under which the executive has the right to terminate the agreement and receive payment equal to approximately three times the employee's annual compensation upon a change in control, as defined. F-35
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE M (continued) Each employment agreement terminates upon death or voluntary termination by the respective employee or may be terminated by the Company upon 30-days' prior written notice by the Company in the event of disability or "cause", as defined in each agreement. 6. 401(k) Plan The Company has a defined contribution retirement plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code covering all nonunion employees over age 21 who have been employed by the Company for at least one year. Employees may contribute to the plan, on a tax-deferred basis, up to 15% of their total annual salary. Company contributions are discretionary. Beginning with the plan year ending February 28, 1994, the Company elected to match contributions at a rate of $.25 per dollar contributed by the employee on up to a maximum of 3% of the employee's total annual salary. Employer contributions for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 were $36, $25 and $21, respectively. 7. Other Benefits The Company provides, on a contributory basis, medical benefits to active employees. The Company does not provide medical benefits to retirees. NOTE N - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 1. Commitments The Company's operations are principally conducted in leased premises. The leases generally have initial terms ranging from 5 to 20 years and usually provide for renewal options ranging from 5 to 20 years. Most of the leases contain escalation clauses and common area maintenance charges (including taxes and insurance). Certain of the leases require additional (contingent) F-36
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE N (continued) rental payments if sales volumes at the related restaurants exceed specified limits. As of March 31, 2002, the Company has noncancelable operating lease commitments, net of certain sublease rental income, as follows: Lease Sublease Net lease commitments income Commitments ----------- -------- ----------- 2003 $ 4,784 $ 2,434 $ 2,350 2004 4,313 2,080 2,233 2005 4,209 2,005 2,204 2006 3,988 1,904 2,084 2007 3,763 1,762 2,001 Thereafter 13,194 7,416 5,778 -------- -------- -------- $34,251 $17,601 $16,650 ======== ======== ======== Aggregate rental expense, net of sublease income, under all current leases amounted to $2,734, $3,549 and $2,848 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, respectively. The Company also owns or leases sites, which it leases or subleases to franchisees. The Company remains liable for all lease costs when properties are subleased to franchisees. The Company also subleases non-Miami Subs locations to third parties. Such sub-leases provide for minimum annual rental payments by the Company aggregating approximately $2.4 million and expire on various dates through 2010 exclusive of renewal options. Contingent rental payments on building leases are typically made based on the percentage of gross sales on the individual restaurants that exceed predetermined levels. The percentage of gross sales to be paid and related gross sales level vary by unit. Contingent rental expense was approximately $129, $123, $123 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, respectively. F-37
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE N (continued) The Company guarantees certain equipment financing for franchisees with a third-party lender. The Company's maximum obligation for loans funded by the lender, as of March 31, 2002, was approximately $1.4 million. The Company also guarantees a franchisee's note payable with a bank. The Company's maximum obligation for loans funded by the lender, as of March 31, 2002, was approximately $333. 2. Contingencies Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Nathan's Famous Operating Corp. were named as two of three defendants in an action commenced in July 2001, in the Supreme Court of New York, Westchester County. According to the amended complaint, the plaintiffs, a minor and her mother, are seeking damages in the amount of $17 million against Nathan's Famous and Nathan's Famous Operating Corp. and one of Nathan's Famous' former employees claiming that the Nathan's entities failed to properly supervise minor employees, failed to monitor its supervisory personnel, and were negligent in hiring, retaining and promoting the individual defendant, who allegedly molested, harassed and raped the minor plaintiff, who was also an employee. On May 29, 2002, as a result of a mediation, this action was settled, subject to final Court approval. In the event the Court approves the settlement, the plaintiffs will be paid $650, which has been accrued for as a component of "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" in the accompanying balance sheets. An action has been commenced, in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida in September 2001 against Miami Subs and EKFD Corporation, a Miami Subs franchisee ("the franchisee") claiming negligence in connection with a slip and fall which allegedly occurred on the premises of the franchisee for unspecified damages. Pursuant to the terms of the Miami Subs Franchise Agreement, the franchisee is obligated to indemnify Miami Subs and hold them harmless against claims asserted and procured an insurance policy which named Miami Subs as an additional insured. Miami Subs has denied any liability to plaintiffs and has made demand upon the franchisee's insurer to indemnify and defend against the claims asserted. The insurer has agreed to indemnify and defend Miami Subs and has assumed the defense of this action for Miami Subs. F-38
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE N (continued) The Company is involved in various other litigation in the normal course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, will have a significant adverse impact on its financial position or results of operations. 3. Miami Subs Tax Audit As a result of the Miami Subs acquisition, the Company obtained a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $5.9 million and a general business credit carryforward of approximately $274. The Miami Subs Federal income tax returns for all fiscal years 1991 through 1996, inclusive, have been examined by the Internal Revenue Service. In January 2002, the Miami Subs tax audit was settled with the IRS Appeals Office. The settlement resulted in a reduction of the net operating loss carryforward to $4,004 and an adjustment to the general business credit to $300. Each of these carryforwards were subject to reductions due to various expiration dates. In addition to these adjustments, the Company made tax and interest payments totaling $344 in full settlement of the audit. As of March 31, 2002, the remaining net operating loss carryforward is $1,289 and the remaining general business credit is $87. These losses and credits are subject to limitations imposed under the Internal Revenue Code pursuant to section 382 regarding changes in ownership. As a result of these limitations, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the remaining Miami Subs loss carryforwards and credits related to the acquisition. NOTE O - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS As of March 31, 2002, Miami Subs leased two restaurant properties from Kavala, Inc., a private company owned by Gus Boulis, a former shareholder of Miami Subs. Future minimum rental commitments due to Kavala at March 31, 2002 under these existing leases was approximately $1.2 million. Mr. Donald L. Perlyn has been an officer of Miami Subs since 1990, a Director since 1997 and President and Chief Operating Officer since July 1998. Mr. Perlyn has been a director of Nathan's since October 1999. Mr. Perlyn served as a member of the Board of Directors of Arthur Treacher's Inc. until March 2002 when Arthur Treacher's, Inc. was sold in a private transaction. Miami Subs has been granted certain exclusive co-branding rights by Arthur Treacher's, Inc. and Mr. Perlyn had been granted options to acquire approximately 175,000 shares of Arthur Treachers' common stock. These options were converted into options of the entity that sold Arthur Treacher's, Inc. F-39
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE P - SIGNIFICANT FOURTH QUARTER ADJUSTMENTS During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company's management continued to monitor and evaluate the collectibility and potential impairment of its assets, in particular, notes receivable and certain fixed assets. In connection therewith, impairment charges on certain notes receivable of $185 and impairment charges on fixed assets of $685 were recorded in the fourth quarter. It is management's opinion that these adjustments are properly recorded in the fourth quarter based upon the facts and circumstances that became available in that period. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company's management continued to monitor and evaluate the collectibility and potential impairment of its assets, in particular, notes receivable and certain fixed assets. In connection therewith, additional allowances for doubtful accounts of $399, impairment charges on certain notes receivable of $273 and impairment charges on fixed assets of $465 were recorded in the fourth quarter. Additionally, Nathan's recorded a $191 lease rental reserve resulting from the default of subleases for space which is not expected to be utilized by Nathan's and $236 in connection with the satisfaction of certain financial guarantees. It is management's opinion that these adjustments are properly recorded in the fourth quarter based upon the facts and circumstances that became available in that period. F-40
Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 NOTE Q - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) First Second Third Fourth quarter quarter quarter quarter ------- ------- ------- ------- Fiscal Year 2002 ---------------- Revenues $11,876 $11,785 $10,380 $10,358 Gross profit (a) 2,988 3,200 2,317 2,201 Net income (loss) 962 654 263 (630) ======= ======= ======= ======= Per share information Net income (loss) per share Basic (b) $.14 $.09 $.04 $(.09) ==== ==== ==== ===== Diluted (b) $.14 $.09 $.04 $(.09) ==== ==== ==== ====== Shares used in computation of net income (loss) per share Basic (b) 7,065,000 7,065,000 7,038,000 7,024,000 ========= ========= ========= ========= Diluted (b) 7,084,000 7,080,000 7,062,000 7,107,000 ========= ========= ========= ========= Fiscal Year 2001 ---------------- Revenues $12,899 $12,666 $11,418 $10,191 Gross profit (a) 3,423 3,457 2,821 2,568 Net income (loss) 745 933 145 (217) ======= ======= ======= ======= Per share information Net income (loss) per share Basic (b) $.11 $.13 $.02 $(.03) ==== ==== ==== ===== Diluted (b) $.11 $.13 $.02 $(.03) ==== ==== ==== ===== Shares used in computation of net income (loss) per share Basic (b) 7,040,000 7,065,000 7,065,000 7,065,000 ========= ========= ========= ========= Diluted (b) 7,044,000 7,155,000 7,065,000 7,130,000 ========= ========= ========= =========
(a) Gross profit represents the difference between sales and the cost sales. (b) The sum of the quarters does not equal the full year per share amounts included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations due to the effect of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the fiscal years as compared to the quarters. F-41REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON SCHEDULE To Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries: We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated financial statements of Nathan's Famous, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in this Form 10-K and have issued our report thereon dated June 14, 2001. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management and is presented for the purpose of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/Arthur Andersen LLP Melville, New York June 14, 2001 This Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants on Schedule is a copy of a previously issued Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") report and has not been reissued by Andersen. The inclusion of this previously issued Andersen report is pursuant to the "Temporary Final Rule and Final Rule: Requirements for Arthur Andersen LLP Auditing Clients," issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in March 2002. Note that this previously issued Andersen report refers to the Schedule as of and for the fifty-two weeks ended March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000. F-42
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS COL. A COL. B COL. C COL. D COL. E - ------------------------------------------------------ --------- ------------------------ ---------- ------------ (1) (2) Additions Balance charged Additions at to charged to Balance at beginning costs and other Deductions end of period Description of period expenses accounts - ------------------------------------------------------ --------- ------------------------- ---------- ------------ Fifty-three weeks ended March 31, 2002 -------------------------------------- Allowance for doubtful accounts - notes and accounts receivable $ 880 $ 267 $ 27(c) $ 530(a) $ 644 ====== ====== ===== ====== ====== Lease reserve and termination costs $ 678 $ 30 $ - $ 372(f) $ 336 ====== ====== ===== ====== ====== Fifty-two weeks ended March 25, 2001 ------------------------------------ Allowance for doubtful accounts - notes and accounts receivable $ 809 $ 191 $ 27 (c) $ 147 (a) $ 880 ====== ====== ===== ====== ====== Lease reserve and termination costs $974 $ 463 $ 801 (d) $1,560 (f) $ 678 ====== ====== ===== ====== ====== Fifty-two weeks ended March 26, 2000 ------------------------------------ Allowance for doubtful accounts - notes and 404 (e) ===== accounts receivable $ 467 $ 895 $ 32 (c) $ 989 (a) $ 809 ====== ====== ===== ====== ====== 274 (e) ===== Lease reserve and termination costs $ - $ 191 $ 660 (d) $ 151 $ 974 ====== ====== ===== ====== ======
(a) Uncollectible amounts written off (b) Uncollectible advertising fund receivables (c) Provision charged to advertising fund (d) Lease termination charge to purchase accounting (e) Assumed as part of the Miami Subs acquisition (f) Payment of lease termination and other costs F-43
Exhibit 21 Nathan's Famous, Inc. SUBSIDIARIES State of Company Name Incorporation - ------------ ------------- Nathan's Famous, Inc. Delaware Nathan's Famous Operating Corp . Delaware Nathan's Famous Systems, Inc. Delaware Nathan's Famous Services, Inc. Delaware Nathan's Famous of Times Square, Inc. New York Nathan's Famous of New Jersey, Inc. New Jersey Nathan's Roadside Rest, Inc. New York Denek of Hicksville, Inc. New York Nathan's Famous of Yonkers, Inc. New York Nathan's Famous of Hicksville, Inc. New York Nathan's Famous of Kings Plaza, Inc. New York Nathan's Famous of Farmingdale, Inc. New York Nathan's Famous of Milford, Inc. Connecticut Nathan's Famous of 325 Fifth Avenue, Inc. New York Nathan's Famous Forest Avenue, Inc. New York Namasil Realty Corp. New York Nathan's Famous of H.D., Inc. Delaware Nathan's Famous of Crossgates, Inc. New York Nathan's Famous, of Lynbrook, Inc. Delaware Miami Subs Corporation Florida Miami Subs USA, Inc. Florida MGIII, Inc. Florida Miami Subs Real Estate Corp. Florida Walnut Enterprises, Inc. Texas QSR, Inc. Florida Miami Subs of Delaware, Inc. Delaware B & B Food Venture, Inc. Florida PRSC, Inc. Florida NF Roasters Corp. Delaware NF Roasters of Commack, Inc. New York NF Roasters of Rockville Centre, Inc. New York
EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS We have issued our report dated May 24, 2002 (except for Note N-2, as to which the date is May 29, 2002), accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of Nathan's Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Nathan's Famous, Inc. on Forms S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-92995, 333-86195, 333-86043, 33-72066, 33-89442 and 33-93396). /s/GRANT THORNTON LLP Melville, New York June 24, 2002